Hey guys.
So I finally had a chance to sit down and do a once over of my NR 858 against my NR vz58. I saw the bolt was tabbed on the newer vz58. My 858 wasn't.
I went through the whole gremlin thread and came to the conclusion that it really comes down to the leaf spring locking down the sear. Which wasn't a problem when the. 858 mechanics were untouched for selective fire??
Was the gremlin not a reported issue of the mil surp rifles prior to being modified for the Canadian market? If it's just a matter of balancing the action of the bolt as it cycles then would it be more prudent to tab the bolt or modify the spring.
The bolt is at 'risk' for welding.(improper heat/ poor fit etc)
And the modified spring will fatigue back or affect trigger action
So I finally had a chance to sit down and do a once over of my NR 858 against my NR vz58. I saw the bolt was tabbed on the newer vz58. My 858 wasn't.
I went through the whole gremlin thread and came to the conclusion that it really comes down to the leaf spring locking down the sear. Which wasn't a problem when the. 858 mechanics were untouched for selective fire??
Was the gremlin not a reported issue of the mil surp rifles prior to being modified for the Canadian market? If it's just a matter of balancing the action of the bolt as it cycles then would it be more prudent to tab the bolt or modify the spring.
The bolt is at 'risk' for welding.(improper heat/ poor fit etc)
And the modified spring will fatigue back or affect trigger action