thanks for the replies. Your replies all make sense to me too.
But after some serious digging, I got some great info from the 2/95 Rifles in the U.K.
They have several original training manuals that they quoted and use in their drills and shooting.
They often shoot at targets with live rounds.
Carrying paper cartridges, biting the cartridge and flipping the ramrod 180 was standard procedure with the Brown Bess musket.
But not for the Baker Rifle balls which were issued in pre-wrapped leather patches.
The Baker Rifle ramrod was not flipped 180 degrees. The mushroom cap was for the palm. The hole under the mushroom cap was for a "torque bar" that was used in withrawing a ball from the barrel. They also stated that the mushroom cap on original Baker Rifle ramrods were too big to fit the barrel. The palm mushroom cap was to get a leather patched ball down the barrel without damaging hands and that it is next to impossible to grasp the steel ramrod firmly enough with sweaty hands to get anything down the barrel.
Here's the most interesting part.
"The 'pointy end' of the Baker rod was not the 'male' screw version that is common to the Indian-made re-enactors weapons we get imported in. It was a wider 'female' end, wide enough to push a ball down without jamming the rod between the barrel and the ball - something the 'pointy-end' male screw type are likely to do." As the Indians ship Baker non-rifled muskets, they feel that the ramrod is really only needed for attachments so that ramrod authenticity not required.
So to keep everything historically correct, I'll have to widen the tapered hole in the stock to accept a larger female thread. Trying to find a 1/4" or so drill bit about 3 foot long should prove interesting.
For the time being, I think that I'll stay with paper cartridges and my homemade ramrod which uses .450marlin brass.
OK, Musketfire, I'll try biting the cartridge but will hold off taking the ball in my mouth for the time being.
cheers,
Ted