The most telling comment IMO on this thread as regards ethics of long distance shooting. The longer distance means an animal can move after the trigger is pulled (my wording). The longer the distance the greater the possibility of this happening. In our efforts as hunters to attain the humane kill shot we are running a much higher risk of wounding an animal. To my way of thinking long range shots should be taken at targets.
I think those with a lot of experience observing animals and shooting at longer ranges can predict with pretty amazing accuracy when an animal is going to remain stationary for the shot and when it's not. Watch enough animals and they become pretty predictable. If they are moving so much that a bullet flight time of less than a second could make the difference between a lethal hit and wounding the animal, the ethical thing would be not to take the shot. I honestly don't see much issue with predicting when an animal will remain stationary long enough for the shot. You really do need to pay attention to animal behaviour though. If time of flight is such a determining factor for the ethics of shot range, archery hunters should be a target long before long-range shooters. The time of flight of an arrow can be measured in seconds if one is truly concerned about the animal moving. Plus sound becomes a factor there too where it does not with a rifle shot. It's all about putting things in perspective.




















































