Would a Swiss Vetterli antique in .41 Swiss rimfire still be classified as an antique if it has been modified to no longer shoot .41 rimfire, but .41 center fire handloaded ammo?
I dont see how they an institute a policy that is contrary to the letter of the law?
Would a Swiss Vetterli antique in .41 Swiss rimfire still be classified as an antique if it has been modified to no longer shoot .41 rimfire, but .41 center fire handloaded ammo?
Mooncoon got it right, I looked up the gun too quick and didn't realize it was a repeater.
No; it would become modern because the antique classification for pre 1898 repeating rifles only applied to rimfires. The availability of ammunition is not applicable
cheers mooncoon
sooo, if i read that frt right, its only the colt 1889 series thats affected, not the 1873 SAA series that we see so much of up here?
It sounds like what Dingus mentioned was more of a policy change covering all antiques and the only direct gun named is a Colt 1889 in .357 which is a terrible caliber choice for that gun anyways.
Terrible? More like crazy or maybe even stupid.
It sounds like what Dingus mentioned was more of a policy change covering all antiques and the only direct gun named is a Colt 1889 in .357 which is a terrible caliber choice for that gun anyways.



























