I may need some help from you guys preparing for the meeting, history of the RCMP abuses, facts that bolster our position etc..
Steve
You know my contact info
I may need some help from you guys preparing for the meeting, history of the RCMP abuses, facts that bolster our position etc..
Steve
The FRT have listed ALL French 1892s as Restricted for 14 years there just now getting around to changeing them.
Yes even the pre 1898 ones. So why was no one worried about that before today, they just applyed for a letter on the pre 1898 ones.
The FRT numbers on dozens of antiques have them listed as prohibs and restricted the entire thing is a mess full of mistakes. includeing the french 1873s in 45 acp.
some of you are acting like the FRT data base was all perfect with every gun in its correct class right from the start that is just not the case at all.
Anyone even a cave man can show a court or any LEO that the FRT system is wrong because theres enough correct listing in there to show and compare like a webley MKII in 45 acp.
Tho if we just ignored the entire RCMP CFC system and just went by the Law which is SOR /98 -464 and use the cartridge list that we have always used we might be better off.
Rcmp letter is defacto registration. RCMP letter is not required by law never has been. they just come in handy for customs or guys who like to bush pack makes them feel better but just remember it says right on the RCMP letters this letter is granted "based on the info that was supplied"
So lets face it the letters are not as good as most think.
,I have and antique belgian gun with no antique letter based on the guns markings and cartridge it chambers the gun has no maker or serial number but no one is argueing its not antique or perscribed antique it is what it is and antique pre 1893 handgun...
I think if we just make sure our guns meet the requirements of the "LAW" in Age and Caliber then we should be Ok.
Maby im way off but you can not rely on "ALL" the FRT listings when it comes to antique handguns at least not in the last 14 years.
I think if they change the List of cartridges on the NO list by adding some thats when the real troble starts.
But that would be changeing the laws not just policy. It will happen one day in some way thats why its called gun control.
If you have a copy of the law (Cartridge lists) and some proof your gun is pre 1898 thats really all we should need.
But as far as the FRT listing being incorrect on some handguns Customs and myself has been dealing with that for years.
But keep writeing letters do whatever you think will put presure on them to drop this whole thing its all a mess just more of a mess now, thats my 2cts
Anyone know what happened to NO FAC .Com in Red deer AB ? he was charged with abuch of offences and had over 100 antique handguns taken away. 3 or 4 years ago now.
I have never herd a word about this.
... Tho if we just ignored the entire RCMP CFC system and just went by the Law which is SOR /98 -464 and use the cartridge list that we have always used we might be better off.
Rcmp letter is defacto registration. RCMP letter is not required by law never has been. ...
... I think if we just make sure our guns meet the requirements of the "LAW" in Age and Caliber then we should be Ok.
...If you have a copy of the law (Cartridge lists) and some proof your gun is pre 1898 thats really all we should need.
I agree. The day of the RCMP letter is over.
Well, I guess every converted 1873 just became converted to 455 mkII
Tho if we just ignored the entire RCMP CFC system and just went by the Law which is SOR /98 -464 and use the cartridge list that we have always used we might be better off.
Rcmp letter is defacto registration. RCMP letter is not required by law never has been. they just come in handy for customs or guys who like to bush pack makes them feel better but just remember it says right on the RCMP letters this letter is granted "based on the info that was supplied"
So lets face it the letters are not as good as most think.
I have an antique belgian gun with no antique letter based on the guns markings and cartridge it chambers the gun has no maker or serial number but no one is argueing its not antique or perscribed antique it is what it is and antique pre 1893 handgun...
I think if we just make sure our guns meet the requirements of the "LAW" in Age and Caliber then we should be Ok.
Maby im way off but you can not rely on "ALL" the FRT listings when it comes to antique handguns at least not in the last 14 years.
I think if they change the List of cartridges on the NO list by adding some that's when the real trouble starts.
But that would be changing the laws not just policy. It will happen one day in some way that's why its called gun control.
If you have a copy of the law (Cartridge lists) and some proof your gun is pre 1898 that's really all we should need.
But as far as the FRT listing being incorrect on some handguns Customs and myself has been dealing with that for years.
As the FRTs (and the whole system for that matter) are so screwed up, I think the only long term solution is to push for across the board pre-1899 rule for antiques (like the US).
Dingus and loki, thanks for all you are doing.
Yes, you guys have been a big help. Thankyou!
Critique needed here (click here).
I'm attempting to bring some attention to the antiques policy change, not one headline is covering it and it's all CZ858 and Swiss Arms. So if you have points to make about that thread, or critique to give do so there please, it could use a bump every so often as that new forum is moving fast and stuff drops to the bottom.
Yes, you guys have been a big help. Thankyou!
Here is my thread regarding my home made Antique Status Letter Dingus mentioned:
http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/861067-Antique-Status-Letter-For-Download
The letter itself:
Canadian Antique Status Firearms Letter PDF Download
Scanned Copy:
![]()



























