10/22 Custom Receivers

Brocolt said:
I still have a concern about how it would sit in a stock as the receiver is not contoured in the rear, like I said before Dr. Lector removed the pic with it sitting in the stock and it just didn't look like it sat right.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't worry about the way it sits in the stock. LECTOR probably removed the pic becuase he didn't realize it had captured an image of some other secret part he is harassing DLASK to make that he doesn't want us to know about.:D:D
 
I'll feel better once I see someones or Dr. Lectors action mounted/bedded on a stock. But now I wish I keeped my bolt I just sold on EE a few weeks ago. Now the race has started to see who the winner is to build their dlask 10/22 first

Question: I guess dlask forgot to install a rear cleaning access hole. Any idea how many receivers were made on this run?
 
+1. Not contoured could lead to problems. Lets see pics.
Click to expand...
I am not sure what kind of problems it can lead to. Care to explain?




The rear of the receiver is straight, not tapered, not slanted.
I am not sure how else it can have picatinny on the full length
if the receiver was not straight.







In addition, the top is thicker than OEM, with picatinny or not.

dar22_019e.jpg









Therefore, its top rear is higher than the OEM Ruger receiver.
So are a big majority of the aftermarket receivers on US market.
Yes, it does stick above the stock, like the center-fire semi auto Rugers,
like the M-14 or whathaveyou.

dar22_026e.jpg


^^^^^^^^^
This above is a DAR-22 receiver that is fully-seated (not bedded)
in a regular Hogue stock.







If you guys are so in love with the slanted/rounded receiver,
then I humbly suggest to stick to your OEM Ruger receiver, or get
a Kidd or whatever else.

If I miss the 60"s, I listen to J. Hendrix.
Other people drive rounded-off T-Birds or hit the bong.






This one is emo-kid Clobbersauras' gun:

dar22_016e.jpg










Detail of the ejection port that is flared in its upper half:

dar22_028e.jpg





So, let me ask this again, what are the potential problems
of the non-contoured rear, other than not blending in with the OEM stock
or not matching your image of the 60's style?
 
Last edited:
Nice peice of gear . Right now i only have one stock peice on my gun .. soon to be replaced by the dar22 reciever . Dlask kicks a$$ !! . just need to source some hardware so i can assemble a stock 1022 from the old reciver and other parts . anyone know the length and tread of the v block bolts ?

Good call on the pink gun clobb maybe we can have guns as long as thier pink . but ill have to check with rcmp. id paint your type 97 pink or disquise it in a empty pepsi box better yet a tim hortons donut box ...thats the last place they look
 
Last edited:
Yea .Dlask should offer a "Combo Target Package". Receiver and barrel from Dlask would be a perfect match.A 16 inches barrel attached to their receiver would rock .
 
My mistake. I was under the impressing that the back of the receiver was square instead of having rounded edges, which would be a problem fitting into any stock.

My mistake . They look great.
 
Lookin' goood DR. Lector!! :D
Great to see someone finally had the brass monkeys to build these in Canada for the Canadian market!! (and at an affordable price!!)
You'll do well.....;)
 
Wham-O said:
Lookin' goood DR. Lector!! :D
Great to see someone finally had the brass monkeys to build these in Canada for the Canadian market!! (and at an affordable price!!)
You'll do well.....;)
Click to expand...

Thank you, but I do not deserve any of this credit.
This design is not mine.
Joe Dlask did the all the reverse engineering and
all the design improvements by himself.
I did absolutely nothing else than to convince him,
(but again, I've been pushing for this and trying to convince him
since 12 yrs ago or so - IIRC, at that time,
the only aftermarket receiver manufacturer was AMT).
In all this time, I made my own receivers for a while,
mostly out of steel, some of them were take-down.

The DAR-22 is Joe Dlask' entirely. It does show his skill and expertise.
The integral picatinny on top is because of the popular demand,
(Canadians have this obsession with 10/22 receivers made
out of steel and with integral picatinny.... nyah, nyah, nyah.......
...... while the US guys snapped out of this years ago.....).

But there are and there will be
some DAR-22 receivers with flat top as well.
Personally, I can live without the integral picatinny,
as I like and I often prefer the flat top.
However, I am a big fan and a fierce supporter
of the increased thickness of the top
which is a MUST in a modern 10/22
(with or without integral picatinny)- and maybe that was
my only (and humble) contribution to the first DAR-22's.




On a different note, I hope that in the near future we will have
a "Made in Canada" aftermarket trigger-group case as well
(CNC-ed, aluminum, double lug in the front, the works).
 
Last edited:
SCDL said:
:cheers:

Now... What about .22 WMR receivers? :D
Click to expand...
I do not believe there will be, I'm sorry.
The demand is too small to justify that kind of project.






Bull's-Eye said:
Oh, will there be a Stainless one available that's not an 80% but fully complete?
Click to expand...
In my understanding, there will be no stainless receiver from Dlask.
I have tried to push for a steel one for the near future,
but there are no chances of that either.






Brocolt said:
Any idea how many receivers were made on this run?
Click to expand...
I do not know the total number, but there were not that many.
Saturday they were asking people not to order more than one.








Brocolt said:
Dr. Lector have you tried the gun out yet? how do the internal parts fit?
Click to expand...
You do not need to do any gunsmithing to fit the bolt and TG.
However, you have to check the bolt
for any kind of nicks or dents before attempting to install it.
I will post about that in a couple of days.








Grizzlypeg said:
Will this dlask receiver fit in an Evolution stock?
Click to expand...

I guess you are asking about the Evolution from RB Precision.
The external dimensions of the DAR22 that fit in the stock
are similar to the OEM Ruger, but people say
the RBP Evolution has a tighter fit than other stocks.
I do not believe there will be problems
with the fit in a 1st generation Evolution.
The second generation, however, has that rail
that protrudes towards the back
and hanging above the receiver, so that may be a problem,
as it may interferre with the integral picatinny.
The same can happen with the FS556 or Nordic stocks,
but the above is only a personal guess,
as I did not try this first hand.

But if you are asking about the Boyd's SS Evolution (laminated thumbhole),
then I do not think there will be any kind of receiver fit problem.
However I humbly advise against Boyd's SS Evolution because of
the lack of support for the barrel (unless, of course, you
intend to use a superlite carbon-wrapped barrel
or you are a master of the bedding of the first 2-3 inch of barrel).
 
Last edited:
I do not believe there will be, I'm sorry.
The demand is too small to justify that kind of project.
Click to expand...

Fair enough.

I suppose a lefty 10/22 would be out of the question as well, huh? Though, left eye dominance seems to be much more common than left hand dominance. I wonder why that is.

While I'm in dreamland, maybe a VZ 61 Skorpion lookalike? :onCrack:
 
Regardless of what other people will tell you,
the reason for the 10/22 being a gun for right-hand only
is the fact that the mag is designed for right hand:
like many other 22 guns, the 10/22's primary ejector is the mag's left lip.

If you want to make a lefty 10/22, you will need a "left-hand" mag
(so it can eject on the other side)
and, to be honest, nobody will ever attempt
the task of designing a 10/22 "mirror-ed" mag
(in addition to the left-hand bolt, that is not easy either).
 
Dr. Lector Well I just caved & bought a dlask frame & barrel 5 minutes ago. Well when in Rome.... Do as the Romens do...

Now I have to find 2 stocks for these 10/22 guns I'm building. Anyone manage to get the hogue stocks to work in a 10/22? the last one I used didn't work too good for me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom