You can contact the dealer you purchased it from...NS has sent them the info. If they haven't received it the dealer can contact North Sylva. Remember North Sylva isn't the only importer of these, Impact Outdoors brought in a bunch. I don't know what Impact's return/credit policy on this is going to be as they haven't told us yet. They may be handling it directly with the consumer, we're not sure.
13 inch MSW IWI X95 Tavor now Prohibited
- Thread starter Aprilia Man
- Start date
You can contact the dealer you purchased it from...NS has sent them the info. If they haven't received it the dealer can contact North Sylva. Remember North Sylva isn't the only importer of these, Impact Outdoors brought in a bunch. I don't know what Impact's return/credit policy on this is going to be as they haven't told us yet. They may be handling it directly with the consumer, we're not sure.
Cameron SS
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Ground Zero
Do you think police in alberta and sask have stopped seizing firearms from unlicensed individuals? The provincial legislation passed in alberta and sask is meant to prevent LE agencies from assisting in trudeaus OiC gun grab. It does not prevent front line police of doing ordinary police work.
Police will not proactively visit the homes of tavor owners and attempt to enforce compliance of these revocation notices. However anyone found in possession of one after the 30 day grace period indicated on the revocation notice is in possession of an unregistered prohibited firearm without a valid license to possess that firearm and is legally no different than a gangbanger with a prohibited pistol tucked in their draws.
These guns and their owners would not be protected from any OiC amnesty so those waiting for the importers or any other remedy would do so at the complete whim of law enforcement. Not a situation many would be comfortable with.
Im confident police will never come to seize them and so its not an outrageous suggestion to do nothing and wait. But this is a suggestion that includes knowingly committing offences under the criminal code.
Filing a s74 application to challenge the revocation is a legal right and it has the benefit of pausing the 30 day surrender period. However unless you have evidence that can rebut the expert witnessess that the government will produce and can effectively argue some very complex legal issues you are unlikely to be successful in that reference hearing.
The other disadvantage to filing a s74reference is you are sticking your head up for further scrutiny. As the saying goes its the nail that sticks out the most that gets hammered first.
To each their own.
Last edited:
Is that opinion, speculation or is it experience or based on others' experience?
you will not know up to the time ...
Canada's National Firearms Association's legal team is working on a remedy for this situation,
Call the NFA at 1 780 439 1394 if you have received a revocation notice.
Or email blair@nfa.ca
rajczak_kashka
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Surrey, B.C.
F@ck them. They can come and get it. These were never fully auto and were manufactured as semi for Israeli police.
The NFA is working on a legal remedy using Firearms act Section 74 - if you are interested contact the NFA at 780-439-1394
or https://nfa.ca/contact-us/
They were never fully automatic to begin with, so impossible to be a "converted auto"
Cameron SS
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Ground Zero
You are assuming the RCMP technicians are constrained in their assessments by Facts, Reason, or the plain meaning of words.
That's a good one.
I am hopeful a judge may be so constrained
Judges make decisions based on 1) the law and 2) the truths and lies presented in their courtroom.
Judges have no way to make a correct decision based on truth mixed with emotion, falsehood, innuendo, and biased opinion portrayed as "EVIDENCE".
A judge is a bureaucrat with extraordinary power appointed by a biased government.
Judges have political bias and I have experienced a judges personal bias in the courtroom.
