LOL, quality and function of the Nork are on par with any spring. You clearly have NO experience with Nork M1A.
Last edited by a moderator:
$16,600 Norc
- Thread starter Glock-a-maniac
- Start date
LOL, quality and function of the Nork are on par with any spring. You clearly have NO experience with Nork M1A.
cute.
I bet a Norc in my hands could outshoot an M1A in the hands of a No personal insults
Last edited by a moderator:
- Location
- Witness Protection Program
Last edited by a moderator:
reccman
CGN Regular
Last edited by a moderator:
People need to understand that all shooting is not hunting!
Hunting regulation only refer to hunting. I can target shoot all I want at night.
This is hilarious. I have owned several M1A's and the vast majority of Springfield receivers are out of spec, machined improperly and all are cast.
The norc receiver on the other hand is regarded to be as close to the USGI spec as it gets and is forged. Please do some research before you go off about SAI's "superior" quality. SAI receivers are cast in QC and alot of their parts are made in taiwan.
They are not worth the asking price. I just had a rifle built using USGI parts on a forged polytech receiver and total cost was less than the M1A standard with its cast receiver and knock off parts.
Last edited:
I sincerely apologize for the post I made earlier with regards to the word "chink". I apologize to anyone who was offended by said posting...that definately is not my style. I am not a racist....just a fan of the finer sporting arms. I never intended for my post to stir up racial tensions.
Somehow we'll get this thread back on track.
When it gets warm enough for me to do load development on this Norc M1A, there won't be any excuses as to whether or not it can shoot any better in that hands of someone else or it wasn't supported properly or my optics weren't as good as they could have been. I know what made the gun shoot before and I'll follow the same ingredients as before also. In the end, it will boil down to whether or not the stock holds the gun in place for it to be an accurate shooter.
In the meantime however, if anyone has any groups they've shot with their
M1A and want to talk about what their feeding these guns in order for them to actually shoot, be my guest. We can all learn something here.
When it gets warm enough for me to do load development on this Norc M1A, there won't be any excuses as to whether or not it can shoot any better in that hands of someone else or it wasn't supported properly or my optics weren't as good as they could have been. I know what made the gun shoot before and I'll follow the same ingredients as before also. In the end, it will boil down to whether or not the stock holds the gun in place for it to be an accurate shooter.
In the meantime however, if anyone has any groups they've shot with their
M1A and want to talk about what their feeding these guns in order for them to actually shoot, be my guest. We can all learn something here.
Sometimes it is easy to forget that words are deemed racist epitaphs.
Hokus Grey
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Somewhere between "WTF?" and "FTW!".
Hmm.....seems I need to buy one of these norc M-14s. And COD MW2.
Nice rifle. I'm a fan of the JAE stock over the Troy but to each there own.
The thermal scope is great. I have always wanted to play with one but never had the $ to get my hands on one.
How do you like it? Have you had a chance to test it out yet?
The thermal scope is great. I have always wanted to play with one but never had the $ to get my hands on one.
How do you like it? Have you had a chance to test it out yet?
friend of mine shoots it iron sights @ 800 m no trouble hitting a target.
not junk.
i shot cq 311 against guys and kicked their a.. no problem.
only issue is looks...
You cannot see a target through iron sights at 800m. Oh wait, was it a tank?
