Range report: Dina Arms .22LR adapters for 12 gauge
Here is my preliminary range report for the Dina Arms .22LR adapters.
I used them with my Stoeger Condor Outback O/U 12-gauge shotgun, firing from the bottom barrel (the one which fires first). Each, time I was careful to always align them the same way, to avoid any variance due to the off-centre .22 chamber (has to be that way so the firing pin strikes the rim of the casing).
I used a bench rest, shooting at a 21x21" handgun target, at a distance of 25m. Ammunition used was Remington Thunderbolt (high velocity).
Adapter #1: 2 shots out of 5 hit the paper, 9" apart, roughly centred vertically, but 8.5" left of my Point of Aim (POA). No idea where the other 3 rounds went.
See picture below.
Adapter #2:
1st grouping: 6.25"; 2" low, and 1" left.
2nd grouping: 6"; 4" low, 3" left.
Somewhat better than Adapter #1, but still not very consistent.
See picture below.
Clearly, the results were disappointing. Even the better of the two adapters only showed 25 Minute-of-Angle (MOA) accuracy, and grouping location was inconsistent.
I'll try with different ammo (Remington CeeBee, Target, and hyper-velocity), to see if better results can be obtained, but so far, I don't have high hopes of acceptable accuracy with these inserts.
Here is my preliminary range report for the Dina Arms .22LR adapters.
I used them with my Stoeger Condor Outback O/U 12-gauge shotgun, firing from the bottom barrel (the one which fires first). Each, time I was careful to always align them the same way, to avoid any variance due to the off-centre .22 chamber (has to be that way so the firing pin strikes the rim of the casing).
I used a bench rest, shooting at a 21x21" handgun target, at a distance of 25m. Ammunition used was Remington Thunderbolt (high velocity).
Adapter #1: 2 shots out of 5 hit the paper, 9" apart, roughly centred vertically, but 8.5" left of my Point of Aim (POA). No idea where the other 3 rounds went.
See picture below.
Adapter #2:
1st grouping: 6.25"; 2" low, and 1" left.
2nd grouping: 6"; 4" low, 3" left.
Somewhat better than Adapter #1, but still not very consistent.
See picture below.
Clearly, the results were disappointing. Even the better of the two adapters only showed 25 Minute-of-Angle (MOA) accuracy, and grouping location was inconsistent.
I'll try with different ammo (Remington CeeBee, Target, and hyper-velocity), to see if better results can be obtained, but so far, I don't have high hopes of acceptable accuracy with these inserts.
Last edited:





















































