243 win 105 berger vld, dead elk 688 yards

Who knew a video of a gal making a nice shot, could release so many dinosaures complete with non functional gray matter from their sandstone graves,

You boys shootin coreloss bullets outa your 399 Wallmart package muskets, sure do a lot of beakin about shots that will be forever beyond their abillity.

It does make for some funny schitt to read though.;)
 
Who knew a video of a gal making a nice shot, could release so many dinosaures complete with non functional gray matter from their sandstone graves,

You boys shootin coreloss bullets outa your 399 Wallmart package muskets, sure do a lot of beakin about shots that will be forever beyond their abillity.

It does make for some funny schitt to read though.;)
Yeah, what a bunch of dinosaurs. Really, who didn't shoot their first big game animal beyond 600 yards? :rolleyes:

From John Burns himself:
Well that was the first and only shot she has ever fired at a big game animal. Wish I had her record.

ww.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/5880668/6
 
Haven't shot much, have you.

How can a bullet penetrate a shoulder and then "explode"? What physics makes it able to do that? How long does it take for an elk to run 100 yards before it drops? Five seconds? A man can do it in 10. There is a profound difference between 5 seconds from the shot to the animal's death, and an animal lying paralyzed for half an hour it will take those guys to get to that spot. That's the difference between a short death run and a spine shot. Spined animals are most often NOT dead. The difference is suffering.

A man can do 100 yards in 10 seconds? WOW!!!

Must be something very good in the water where you are from.

Sure, Olympic sprinters can do it , can you?;)
 
Well, when John Burns is looking over your shoulder, superior marksmanship is achieved via osmosis.

Not quite osmosis, but, you **** ****...superior marksmanship is aquired by him taking you out shooting for the day, showing you how to run a 5000$ custom gun, coaching you through every hit on the gongs one at a time until you're comfortable shooting, and then finally instructing you step by step to shooting your first animal.

Holy Christ you guys make it sound like there's no prep work involved....like he just tells them "and with the power of Grey Bull comes awesome marksmanship"....some of you guys bashing this need to do some research on him before you gawk. And for the record, I don't shoot VLD's nor do I even like any rifle grey bull builds, I'm not a fanboy, I don't hunt LR or even shoot it (my longest target shots are 500 yards). I just know enough about Johns work and have read enough of his posts over on 24 hr to know he's not just "holding into the wind and high" and sending bullets randomly at animals.


Now I see why I go over to the fire more...theres not as many ignorant, crotchety old bastards there.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Being 700 yards away is not hunting, it is long range shooting. Shooting is not hunting,

Hunting is the practice of pursuing any living thing, usually wildlife, for food, recreation, or trade. How the hell is what John is doing here not the definition of hunting? Just because your definition of "hunting" dont shuck and jive with Johns doesnt give you the right to call it anything.
 
Long range hunting is certainly ethical, if you are practiced and know your bullet is going to hit where you want it. This is very doable with lots of time spent on the range practicing. Obviously you need the equipment and the practice to do it ethically, but if you can hit the kill zone whocares what range you hunt at?

What I take issue with is doing this with a .243 on an elk. A .243 is fine on an elk close range and with perfect shot placement. At 688 yards you're looking at about 900 ft/lbs of energy. Not nearly enough for an elk. What if she shot a little forward and hit the shoulder? You would have a wounded elk going a looooong ways. Looks to me like the animal was spined.

Here's the man himself speaking about the .243 on Elk...

****Originally Posted By: BuckeyeSpecial
While that 105 VLD did it this time, it ain't much of a bullet statistically out of a 243 at near 800 yards to do it 10 times out of 10, or even 5 times out of 10 in a very experienced hand with those yardages and wind conditions.


John Barnes- I am interested in the “statistics” you speak of concerning the .243 Win/105 VLD. Could you post findings as your “statistics” are contrary to mine? I have only seen a dozen or so elk killed with the 243 Win/105 VLD so my sample is not overly large.

The 243 Win/105 VLD is a proven elk killer in the hands of a decent shooter. While this is getting out to edge of my comfort level with the combo another friend of mine killed her bull elk this year at 760yds with one shot through the shoulder....****


'Course the couch sitting ethics police say its all wrong, and I'm sure they have such experiences to prove it..
 
Not quite osmosis, but, you dumb phuck...superior marksmanship is aquired by him taking you out shooting for the day, showing you how to run a 5000$ custom gun, coaching you through every hit on the gongs one at a time until you're comfortable shooting, and then finally instructing you step by step to shooting your first animal.
No, that's not how one acquires superior marksmanship. It is acquired from years of practice, probably something like the extent of the time and effort John Burns has put into it. This shooter was inexperienced, period and an accomplished marksman like Burns should have never let her take this shot which was admittedly at the limit of HIS comfort level.
 
No, that's not how one acquires superior marksmanship. It is acquired from years of practice, probably something like the extent of the time and effort John Burns has put into it. This shooter was inexperienced, period and an accomplished marksman like Burns should have never let her take this shot which was admittedly at the limit of HIS comfort level.

She made it look pretty easy. So maybe it isn't that hard with the right equipment and coaching.
 
John Barsness article on Berger Hunting VLDs

John Barsness article on Berger Hunting VLDs, scroll to 10th of pdf.
http://www.riflemagazine.com/magazine/PDF/hl248partial.pdf

His conclusion :
I would be comfortable using VLDs on any North American game from pronghorn to caribou, and probably will, partly because when placed correctly they do not shoot up a bunch of meat. The entrance hole is needle thin, and by the time what’s left of the bullet hits the far side of the chest, the real damage has been done inside.
Alex
 
Haven't shot much, have you.

"Much" means different things to different people. I killed 5 deer this year, my buddy killed 4 and my wife killed 1. So I saw 10 deer die this year. I killed two with a muzzle loader at 50 yards. Lead bullet impact speed ~1450 fps. Both shots were high and both died on the spot. A few years ago I killed a buck at 220 yards with a 300 wby 180gr tsx and I spine shot him just in front of the tenderloins. He went down and his front leg was kicking. I ran towards him and after having run maybe 50 yards he was dead. Point is they do die on the spot. For sure not all the time but again, people shot deer at 150 yards too far back and they run off in the bush and die an hour later. It's the same thing.

How can a bullet penetrate a shoulder and then "explode"? What physics makes it able to do that? How long does it take for an elk to run 100 yards before it drops? Five seconds? A man can do it in 10. There is a profound difference between 5 seconds from the shot to the animal's death, and an animal lying paralyzed for half an hour it will take those guys to get to that spot. That's the difference between a short death run and a spine shot. Spined animals are most often NOT dead. The difference is suffering.

Just because you don't know anything about bullet technology and you don't know how Berger makes their bullets doesn't mean they can't do exactly what I mentioned previously.

You can read this (I know, I know, all smoke and mirrors), and look specifically at the wound channels. You can clearly see the bergers go in without expanding and then expand after a few inches. This is exactly why they use them on high shoulder shots. They will smash through the first few inches without expanding and then violently expand sending shrapnel everywhere.

h ttp://www.bergerbullets.com/Information/Barsness%20Article.pdf

They also have bullets that can tell the difference between drywall and people. They do different things based on what they hit. These are obviously not hunting bullets but it does illustrate the point that bullets can do some pretty amazing things. Just because you don't know anything about that doesn't make it not so.

And your point is what, exactly? No trees means 700 yard shots are hunting? Being 700 yards away is not hunting, it is long range shooting. Shooting is not hunting, whether the shot is 17 yards or 700, shooting is not hunting. Getting close to animals is "hunting". What on earth does "Not exactly lots of trees" have to do with anything?

Hunting is finding critters. We are all "shooters" after we found them. Be that 10 yards with a bow or 700 yards with a rifle. The range at which you feel "shooting" becomes your definition of "hunting" is a number you picked based on your skill and equipment. Other people with better gear and more skill will have different parameters. Doesn't make you right or them wrong.

The fact that there are "not exactly lots of trees" relates to the point that you're not going to sneak up on those elk and shoot them at 50 yards.

So how do monolithic bullets make shooting at long range easier? How do the many things that have changed change the facts that reliably and humanely killing critters is very "iffy" at 700 yards? How many ways are there for that 700 yard shot to go "wrong" even if they have practiced, had good equipment, and could hit paper at that range? How long did the bullet take to get there? A single step by that elk would have changed things dramatically.

I never said mono bullets make long range hunting easier. I used that example to illustrate that technology has changed the way we think about which bullet weights to use for big game hunting. Mono bullets let you take a 308, load a 130gr Barnes and kill stuff.

Technology has made long range hunting easier in many ways. Excellent rifles and optics are reliable and extremely accurate. VLD bullets have very high BC's which means they retain their energy further out there, drop less and buck the wind better. Wind meters tell you things like wind speed, barometric pressure, altitude etc. You can plug that all into your iphone, which will tell you the exact parameters you need to set up the shot. Lets not forget the range finder, which will tell you exactly how far away your target is and since gravity is a constant, you can correct for this. All these things have made it easier to shoot accurately further then prior to these advances in technology occurring.

Time of flight for that bullet was probably ~0.8 seconds or so. Anytime an animal takes a step just prior to the shot things change. How long does it take an arrow from a bow to release and fly 40 yards? Ever see a deer duck under an arrow? I have but nobody says we shouldn't shoot deer with bows because they might move when you release your arrow.

Finally, there is no proof at all for your belief that the elk was dead. It is actually quite unlikely that it died that quickly. If you had shot many animals you would understand that very few drop dead on the spot, no matter what is being shot at them. For an elk to collapse its legs like that, a spine shot is the most likely cause. The immediate "zoom out" is also a common tactic for film makers to avoid the unpleasant view of a struggling, and suffering animal as it dies. I do not have any faith that elk was "humanely" killed.

More importantly there is no proof to show that it wasn't dead. He said it was, the "novice" hunter looked at the animal through her scope after it went down and didn't make any comments contrary to the statements that it was dead. If you just shot your first big game animal and it's still flopping around you might comment on that, don't you think? Like I said before I don't know that I shot "many" animals but of the 5 I killed this year 4 dropped on the spot. With a muzzle loader at 50 yards or a rifle at 250 yards. DRT. The one my wife shot (with a 243 and tiny 80gr ttsx) was also DRT at maybe 60 yards. Watched my friend kill 2 with a muzzle loader at 120 yards, both DRT. Watched him kill a buck at 70 yards, DRT. He killed a doe that was running and that one took two shoots but only cause the first one missed. The second one folded her mid stride. So yes animals do drop dead on the spot. It depends what your shoot them with and where you hit them. Oh and a few years ago my wife shot a deer at 50 yards with a 120gr ballistic tip out of a 7mm rem mag and she hit the spine. It was also DRT.

If you can argue that 700 yard shots are perfectly fine, because you saw one on the internet, you are in for some bad hunting experiences. So are some unfortunate animals.

Like I said initially nobody is telling you to do this, nobody is saying everyone should do this and if you are dumb enough to attempt this because you saw it on the internet, then that makes you the "bad guy", not the people doing this successfully because they have the skill and equipment to do so. I already talked about this at length in my original post. Did you read it?
 
It's all a bunch of BS advertising..... LOOK HOW EASY IT IS TO MAKE 688 YARD SHOTS WITH THIS PRODUCT..... it's irresponsible.... and it isn't hunting... if the animal isn't given a sporting chance of even knowing you were within shooting range how is that fair game?......
 
It was a well placed shot. Both the animals in the videos I saw went down hard. Unethical to some but with today's equipment very possible, as evident in the videos, if one practices lots and has a good rest. I do see it as unethical if there is a lot of wind or they don't have the time to set up properly or a deer is running through the bush @ 150 yrds with his ass facing you. Just goes to show how thinned skinned most animals are in N.A and how a well placed shot kills. Welcome to a new style of hunting that for many is hear to stay.
 
It's all a bunch of BS advertising..... LOOK HOW EASY IT IS TO MAKE 688 YARD SHOTS WITH THIS PRODUCT..... it's irresponsible.... and it isn't hunting... if the animal isn't given a sporting chance of even knowing you were within shooting range how is that fair game?......

But obviously she was within shooting range.
 
But obviously she was within shooting range.

....and obviously the animal had no chance of knowing it.....go reread what you underlined....

Tactical+facepalm_76914c_133816.jpg
 
But obviously she was within shooting range.

:D too f'ing funny isnt he?

Oh Superbrad...what do Elk consider shooting range? I know deer around here have told me they consider "shooting range" 400 yards, while a bull moose once told me he thinks "shooting range" is around 225...


TOO FUNNY!
 
:D too f'ing funny isnt he?

Oh Superbrad...what do Elk consider shooting range? I know deer around here have told me they consider "shooting range" 400 yards, while a bull moose once told me he thinks "shooting range" is around 225...


TOO FUNNY!

I don't care what Elk consider shooting range....sigh... I said if the animal does not have a chance of knowing you are within shooting range it isn't hunting....
 
Here's the man himself speaking about the .243 on Elk...

****Originally Posted By: BuckeyeSpecial
While that 105 VLD did it this time, it ain't much of a bullet statistically out of a 243 at near 800 yards to do it 10 times out of 10, or even 5 times out of 10 in a very experienced hand with those yardages and wind conditions.


John Barnes- I am interested in the “statistics” you speak of concerning the .243 Win/105 VLD. Could you post findings as your “statistics” are contrary to mine? I have only seen a dozen or so elk killed with the 243 Win/105 VLD so my sample is not overly large.

The 243 Win/105 VLD is a proven elk killer in the hands of a decent shooter. While this is getting out to edge of my comfort level with the combo another friend of mine killed her bull elk this year at 760yds with one shot through the shoulder....****


'Course the couch sitting ethics police say its all wrong, and I'm sure they have such experiences to prove it..

.243 is one of my go to rifles, not for long ####s on elk though
 
Back
Top Bottom