300Win Mag V.S 7mm Rem
- Thread starter hunter.d
- Start date
both are good choices for longer range shots of deer and moose, with the right bullet
if you seldom shoot past 300 yards, you could also take a hard look at the 280 Rem, 308 Win, and 30-06.
you don't need a magnum to kill things ya know :wink:
if you seldom shoot past 300 yards, you could also take a hard look at the 280 Rem, 308 Win, and 30-06.
you don't need a magnum to kill things ya know :wink:
death-junky
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Moose Jaw SK
.300 mag all the way....
bigger bullets, harder hitting, shoots as well as the 7mm, more kick but if your hunting it dose not realy mater when the adrenalin is pumping.
talk to ya all later
Riley
P.S. 500th post
bigger bullets, harder hitting, shoots as well as the 7mm, more kick but if your hunting it dose not realy mater when the adrenalin is pumping.
talk to ya all later
Riley
P.S. 500th post
troutseeker
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Prince George, BC
.300 winmag! No doubt! Them 7mm throw itty bitty pills... Seriously :roll: , the .300 WM does not kick that hard and you can shoot heavier bullets. I use mine with 200 gr partitions for hunting.
Troutseeker
Troutseeker
I have both. I like them both and if I could only have one, I would choose the .300 WM, but not by a landslide. And the reason is this. I am slowly getting into long range shooting and the .300 is a bit better at reaching far. Plus I like that the .300 WM brass is available from Lapua. But in your case I think it makes almost no diffrence at all. In fact I doubt the game will notice. In the same rifle the .300 does kick a bit harder, so depending on your recoil tolerance that may be a factor.
