.308 Tavor

$kull said:
I thought the regular Tavor had decent accuracy, but the x95 suffered only.. mostly due to it being designed as an sbr and elongated to fit US and Canadian "laws"
Click to expand...
Interesting. So the X95 is worse accuracy-wise than the TAR? Glad I kept mine then...

DILLIGAF said:
Will be all over this like a fat kid on cake. Will buy the NEA102 while I wait for the SCAR-H and will use the SCAR-H until this .308 Tavor becomes available.

I just hope the SCAR-H doesn't got prohib . fingers crossed.
Click to expand...
Haha. Well, that's what I said about my SCAR-L...
 
lawn gnome said:
It's been three hours since he put the picture up.
I wonder if TV Press Pass is still vibrating?
:dancingbanana:
Click to expand...

I'm busy getting in a screaming match with some idiots over whether that woman YPG sniper video was staged.

I think we knew this design was coming for a long time, and it's interesting to see the hybridization result, but we really don't know anything solid about it, and probably won't for a long time
 
84wh1 said:
As soon as its out, a flood of NEA102's will be on the EE. hehehe
Click to expand...

I'm not so sure about that. The Tavor isn't even close to having as good ergonomics, pacticality and ease of operation as an AR-pattern rifle, let alone modularity and accuracy.
 
+1 for needing to see accuracy.
A 308 that I can't trust to take a deer cleanly at 300 yards...... is like having ICBM nukes that cannot hit the right country.
 
$kull said:
I thought the regular Tavor had decent accuracy, but the x95 suffered only.. mostly due to it being designed as an sbr and elongated to fit US and Canadian "laws"
Click to expand...


I have a X95 and I blasted at 300m with an aim point , using off the shelf SS109 type ammo. I will easily pass a typical military qualification with it.
 
Dietz said:
I'm not so sure about that. The Tavor isn't even close to having as good ergonomics, pacticality and ease of operation as an AR-pattern rifle, let alone modularity and accuracy.
Click to expand...

In my second post on this thread are changed my opinion. Based on price, these 2 would not be in the same league. Now as far as ergonomics and such, to each there own. I myself have owned my Tavor for 4ish years and I find the ergonomics quite user friendly. I've never had an issue operating it. Saying that I have much more professional training on the AR platform so for me, the AR works better. Saying that, if I were professionally trained on the Tavor, I would likely feel opposiite.
 
greentips said:
I have a X95 and I blasted at 300m with an aim point , using off the shelf SS109 type ammo. I will easily pass a typical military qualification with it.
Click to expand...

My Tavor has been minute of coyote at 400+ yds with factory ammo. Can't ask for much more for a quick handling comfortable rifle. I'm very happy with mine. And it's a solid well built rifle to hand down to my grandkids one day, (baring any government action against it.)
 
Desertrat said:
My Tavor has been minute of coyote at 400+ yds with factory ammo. Can't ask for much more for a quick handling comfortable rifle. I'm very happy with mine. And it's a solid well built rifle to hand down to my grandkids one day, (baring any government action against it.)
Click to expand...

Curious to know what ammo you use for that. Thanks in advance.
 
The IDF has been talking about a 7.62NATO rifle for a few years so it is not something they just came out with recently. It is interesting to see IWI goes parallel with both 7.62 TAVOR and the back from the graveyard 7.62 Galil with a plastic receiver.

By the look of it, it is not necessary IDF wants a precision rifle. They just want a bigger 7.62r battle rifle to go with the 5.56.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom