More like they saw a niche that could be filled. 9.3x62 is not a very popular cartridge among North Americans- Most have never heard of it. Certainly not a "proven" sales generator!
For most people, the .375 Ruger would be more appealing, as it's a "375" which is more familiar.
More like they saw a niche that could be filled. 9.3x62 is not a very popular cartridge among North Americans- Most have never heard of it. Certainly not a "proven" sales generator!
For most people, the .375 Ruger would be more appealing, as it's a "375" which is more familiar.
Do we have to wait 100 years before a cartridge is "proven?"
What is the criteria for being "proven?" Who gets to make the call on when something is "proven?"
It will kill animals just as dead as the H&H. What more needs to be "proven?"
ruger rifles in the real world are second class compared to Win. Mod. 70's CZ's/Brnos F/N 98's, Husqvarna. etc.
In what respect are Ruger rifles "second class" ?
I have examples of all the rifle makes described and the Rugers I shoot work as well, if not better, and kill things equally as dead as any of the rifles you have named....
Not a fan of laminates. I prefer a macmillan stocked Ruger to a walnut stocked Brno. Had a Brno in 375 H&H. I far prefer the Alaskan King.
I like most CRF rifles, but until they chamber the .375 Ruger in a stainless rifle with a Macmillan stock, I'll stick with the Rugers...
e.
I realize that you have limited experience but certainly even you can read a ballistic table? The Ruger can launch a larger bullet, faster than the 9.3x62. You can look it up on the intraweb, even!
ruger rifles in the real world are second class compared to Win. Mod. 70's CZ's/Brnos F/N 98's, Husqvarna. etc.
In what respect are Ruger rifles "second class" ?
I have examples of all the rifle makes described and the Rugers I shoot work as well, if not better, and kill things equally as dead as any of the rifles you have named....
You just have to cycle the action. They are not up to par with an F/N 98 or a Husqvarna 1640. The ruger is just a wanna be. And not a very good one.
In what respect are Ruger rifles "second class" ?
I have examples of all the rifle makes described and the Rugers I shoot work as well, if not better, and kill things equally as dead as any of the rifles you have named....
"I can tell if a rifle is better or worse just by cycling the action"
Most guys will actually look at the rifle, check for function, feeding, extraction, check to see it has a firing pin and maybe even do something crazy to judge it like SHOOT it, but not Win/64. He just cycles the action and that's all he needs to know.
Not sure what you would know about "rocket surgery" But it may be the same as you know about quality rifles. Nothing....Yes, and if you paid attention to history, you would understand that we already know that NEW KING performance will work very well- Since it is similar to H&H performance. This isn't rocket surgery...
Guess you didn't get it, eh?
Not surprised, actually.
