While you are on the site, in your browser find and click "Add to Home Screen" A CGN beaver app icon will then be created to your phone that is directly link to the site.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im looking at the S&w 686 and the Ruger gp100, i like both, and the 4" versions are at least 100$-200$ more then their 6" big brother. Which one would you take and why? help me decide!!
I have both the 4.2" and 6" GP-100. Bought the 6" just a few years before the 4.2" became available. If the 4.2" had been first, I likely wouldn't have the 6". The 4.2" feels much more balanced (not nose heavy) and in my opinion is perfect. It is likely the 6" gets a slight edge on accuracy, but the 4.2" shoots very very well.
If you get into PPC, the shorter barrel will allow you to shoot in an extra class. I shoot PPC, and am contemplating between the Ruger and S & W, but it would be in 4.2/4.5 barrel length.
Buy the 4.2" barrel.
The 1 in 16" twist rate of the 4.2" barrel is an insignificant difference vs the 6". The velocity loss due to a slighly shorter barrel is also insignifcant.
The 6" can be unwieldy & heavy, while the shorter barrel can be used for Service competitions. The 6" is not allowed, howver you can use the 4.2" against 6-inchers.
The shorter barrel length is my choice for several reasons:
-Better for holster use
-Balance: full-lugged 6" barrels can be pretty front-heavy.
-I don't find sight radius to be an issue. I can shoot my 4.25" Model 66-8 just a well as a 6" gun.
-Subjective taste: a 4" barrel has the right proportions for a K/L Frame, just as a 5" barrel looks "just right" for an N Frame.