4 or 6 inch Barrel?

Mike 242

Regular
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
New Brunswick
Im looking at the S&w 686 and the Ruger gp100, i like both, and the 4" versions are at least 100$-200$ more then their 6" big brother. Which one would you take and why? help me decide!!
 
I love my 686 4.2" but since this is Canada and it's only for punching holes in paper I'd take the extra 1.8" of barrel if it saved me $200.
 
Either her previous boyfriend only had a 4" pecker or she hasn't felt 6" in a long time.



Jk!



In all honesty, 4.20" revolver barrel is really nice.
I don't regret it one bit.
 
I have both the 4.2" and 6" GP-100. Bought the 6" just a few years before the 4.2" became available. If the 4.2" had been first, I likely wouldn't have the 6". The 4.2" feels much more balanced (not nose heavy) and in my opinion is perfect. It is likely the 6" gets a slight edge on accuracy, but the 4.2" shoots very very well.
 
If you get into PPC, the shorter barrel will allow you to shoot in an extra class. I shoot PPC, and am contemplating between the Ruger and S & W, but it would be in 4.2/4.5 barrel length.
 
About 3 months ago I paid $350 for an unfired 4" gp100 (prohib) it just shows the difference .2" makes. Love my 12/6:dancingbanana:
 
Buy the 4.2" barrel.
The 1 in 16" twist rate of the 4.2" barrel is an insignificant difference vs the 6". The velocity loss due to a slighly shorter barrel is also insignifcant.
The 6" can be unwieldy & heavy, while the shorter barrel can be used for Service competitions. The 6" is not allowed, howver you can use the 4.2" against 6-inchers.
 
The shorter barrel length is my choice for several reasons:

-Better for holster use
-Balance: full-lugged 6" barrels can be pretty front-heavy.
-I don't find sight radius to be an issue. I can shoot my 4.25" Model 66-8 just a well as a 6" gun.
-Subjective taste: a 4" barrel has the right proportions for a K/L Frame, just as a 5" barrel looks "just right" for an N Frame.
 
Back
Top Bottom