I’ll be honest, id rather rifle a barrel with a rock and sticks than with that process.lol
Why would you want a rifled choke anyhow?
Rifled chokes, short sub gauge inserts, ,,, IMO all useless with the choices of ammo available today.
12a to .410 insert top it all!
I’ll be honest, i don’t believe the physics of this will work.
You could only quantify this by high speed camera. I dont believe a rifled choke in the last 3” of a thin tubed barrel, with light rifling, will ever have the ability to create any spin on a projectile. And if it was deep enough, and tight enough to do so, the pressures would be insurmountable and probably see a barrel failure. Your essentially slamming the brakes on an object in motion after it traveled 2 1/2 feet, Then trying to exert another Force onto it.
Be careful, wear glasses and a helmet!
As was pointed out early in the thread, the Paradox guns were used over 100 years ago. Whether or not any spin was imparted, I can't say but examination of a recovered bullet would determine this and makers in the 1800's knew about recovering and examining bullets. Rifled choke tubes were offered, briefly, by Remington, and seemed to work well with sabot slugs.
Chambering a 410 for brass cases etc. sounds a lot like a 405 Winchester.
I was planning on making a mold and casting my own slugs and trying to see what i could get accuracy wise with 41 cal pistol bullets. As i said its not practical i just want to satisfy my curiousity. I know some companies make rifled choke tubes. Briley for example makes them in 10 and 12ga both in twist and straight rifling
I thought id tey a rifled choke first if that didnt go well id look for a 410 handy rifle and stub a 41 cal barrel on it and has it chambered and throated for brass cases and pistol bullets crimped in place