10000000% wrong
That not how too make a legal 50 mag.
I don't see how that's any different than the actual AA ones. its not like they are anything other than repurposed mags either.
10000000% wrong
That not how too make a legal 50 mag.
Then do what your heart desires get them shut down there selling a year in jail to anyone who buys one phone the police immediately, you have spoken to them and or examined them and they are not legit manufactured right Jr
Then do what your heart desires get them shut down there selling a year in jail to anyone who buys one phone the police immediately, you have spoken to them and or examined them and they are not legit manufactured right Jr
I don't see how that's any different than the actual AA ones. its not like they are anything other than repurposed mags either.
Well I probably won't throw it in the garbage but one business saying another business is doing something unlawful didn't work out well last time did it. If they don't have a hate on for there competitor phone them and discuss it private like now there getting bashed in another thread maybe they should be trying to cash in on a trend.
C products says they don't make or currently supply beowulf mags. That is the manufacturer. What does that say about the company supplying the mags?
If that's the case, then the borders placed by Hi Cal, SFRC and the others won't be getting filled. But Hi Cal has said that they have tested these and they are running fine in the .50 rifle it was intended for.
If that's the case, then the borders placed by Hi Cal, SFRC and the others won't be getting filled. But Hi Cal has said that they have tested these and they are running fine in the .50 rifle it was intended for.
C Products makes 30 round 5.56 mags. The size of the .50 mags from them is smaller and would only fit 20 rounds of 5.56 if the crimp was removed.
\Does it show how stupid the law is? Yes. Does it take away the legal jeopardy while the law is in place? No.
Think of it this way. If the receiver is the gun, the metal body is the mag. Everything else is just an accessory attached to the regulated part. (See BC Court of Appeal case law. Possession of unpinned mag bodies alone was sufficient for conviction for possession of prohibited mags.)
If the mag body is originally designed and built from scratch with the intention of fitting one type of rifle or pistol in a specific calibre, that sets it's limit.
Just like a receiver if forged to be a full auto receiver, but is never assembled into a full auto gun, but is instead is made into a semi auto, it will be called a converted auto because of the intent at time of manufacture. This was the issue with 3 or the 4 types of 858.
Parallels in the law and how wording works in the Firearms Act.
If these mag bodies started out life as C Products 20 round 223 mags, they aren't beowulf designed mags. Lancing them, repinning them etc would just be making a prohibited 223 rifle mag.
\
yes but if these mag bodies were decided to be .50 beo at the time of production they are Beowulf designed mags and that would make them legal, regardless of comparable appearance.
The reason SFRC was giving is that they were waiting for a sample to go to the RCMP to approve it. Which doesn't occur.
Best bet for people wanting more clarity would be to take some pictures of the mags, markings and packaging with SKUs and send them to C Products and ask someone in the R&D or legal departments.
C Products states they don't make beowulf mags yet and haven't shipped any go canada. So how are they beowulf mags now?
Check the website I posted near the start of this thread. Has anyone here seen even one bullet (projectile) supposedly made by Fringe Firearms?
It's not impossible that some previously unheard of company went into business, tooled up and started stamping out metal ar mag bodies right off the bat..........but I'm somewhat sceptical.......



























