The advantages of a tang safety are very much dependent on the type of shooting one engages. For the hunter/plinker its not a big issue if the shotgun has either the tang or cross bolt. for competitive shooters, MIL/LE or those who train. The tang safety is the only way to go when ambidextrous controls are a must. You're right, the tang safety and a pistol grip stock are a poor combination. That being said, pistol grip stocks are a poor choice. To each their own.
TDC
ETA: There are other advantages to the Mossberg over the Remington as well. Again, dependent on the type of shooting.
So all those MIL/LE users of the 870s, and all the competitive shooters who shoot crossbolt safety guns are wrong? I don't think so.
Not this again....
I thought this horse was beaten deader than dead and made into glue by now......
....must be a zombie horse.
I never said wrong. The 870 does not permit the same ambidextrous ergonomics as the 500/590 with its tang safety. The 870 also lacks dual extractors and a recessed shell lifter. Small details to some. Significant to others. Most LEO'S can't shoot a shotgun for sh*t so their "issued 870" doesn't support their purchase. Both are good guns. The 500/590 offers a few more features. The Mossberg 500 is also cheaper than an 870.
TDC
you shouldnt need dual extractors. why do you think military issue C7's only have one? if the shotgun's receiver only has an ejection cutout on the right-hand side, than an extractor on the left of the bolt is needless
you shouldnt need dual extractors. why do you think military issue C7's only have one? if the shotgun's receiver only has an ejection cutout on the right-hand side, than an extractor on the left of the bolt is needless
As mentioned. AR's have single extrctors due to their ejector being incorporated into the bolt, not the receiver like that of a shotgun.
Dual extractors are superior to single extractors, and here's how. With two extractors pulling the shell from the chamber the force is equal between the two, creating a straight pull to the rear with little force on the extractor springs. With a single extractor the shell is pulled asymmetrically from one side. All the force of extraction is taken by one extractor which is causing adverse pressure do to the non linear force applied. The dual extractors although double in parts aren't being "worked" as hard. Furthermore, with one extractor broken the shotgun will still run... Kind of. Failures are more common but the gun will run. You break the single extractor in your 870 and you're screwed.
two extractors vs one extractor
Linear extraction force / Asymmetrical extraction force
Less load per extractor / Single ext. bears all of load
Gun will function with one / Gun will not function without one.
Arguably smoother action
The above is just the simple mechanics of it. The benefits of a dual extractor when clearing a double feed is priceless.
TDC
The apparent "slop" and "cheap feel" have no effect on performance and neither do the alternatives(tight and expensive feeling). Looking good and feeling tight are only important when prospecting the female of the species, not shotguns.
TDC




























