6.5x55 hunting bullet choice

[Joel]

100gr TTSX was effective. If I was concerned with beyond 300 yards I'd go with 127gr lrx

 

[redneck09]

100gr TTSX was effective. If I was concerned with beyond 300 yards I'd go with 127gr lrx

Effective on deer? Or did you use it on bigger game? Seems like a nice low recoil deer round.

 

[todbartell]

What did you hunt with that load? Also does a guy need a fast twist for bullets that long?

I packed it for moose and whitetail deer. Didn't get a shot when packing the rifle

1:8 twist stabilized it well

 

[Joel]

Effective on deer? Or did you use it on bigger game? Seems like a nice low recoil deer round.

The way it blows through deer on shot angles that have stopped 180gr SP I'd hunt almost anything tbh..

 

[mmattockx]

The way it blows through deer on shot angles that have stopped 180gr SP I'd hunt almost anything tbh..

+1. The Barnes bullets penetrate like almost nothing else. I have some 6.5mm 127gr LRX bullets I planned to use for a moose load, but never got the tag so they sit on the shelf in my reloading room. I figure they would be good for anything short of elk or grizzly.


Mark

 

[Joel]

+1. The Barnes bullets penetrate like almost nothing else. I have some 6.5mm 127gr LRX bullets I planned to use for a moose load, but never got the tag so they sit on the shelf in my reloading room. I figure they would be good for anything short of elk or grizzly.


Mark

Hope you get the chance some time Mark! Regardless of the rifle!

Theres a few other good testimonies of what the 100gr does on the board as well. Couple moose taken very cleanly 260 rem etc.

I haven't yet but like I said after seeing it go through enough spine etc and not get caught, no worries here. Shots that went through ribs left nice holes too. They're hard to top.

If a guy said thats too light for him thrn the 127 is superb but plenty of testimony on the 120gr ttsx too. I find the others open a bit easier tho but could be wrong

 

[bcsteve]

I had a Tikka T3X in 6.5x55 which was giving me a hard time to find an accurate load until I tried the 143gr ELD-X.

 

[Mulletard]

100gr TTSX was effective. If I was concerned with beyond 300 yards I'd go with 127gr lrx

I will try some 100grn partitions I loaded next year maybe. Just haven't committed to monos for anything yet. But I want to use my 7x57 or 300 savage this year

I should really make the jump though for everything.


The 100grn cup and core did the job, but last year was close amd it was pretty explosive at 3000fps.

 

[hend238]

142 ABLR work supurbly in my Sako 6.5x55. By far the most accurate. 140 Partitions were a close second. But of course every rifle is different.

 

[punkkinen]

I've had good success on whitetails with my sako 85 using 140 partitions and 160 Hornady RN's, partitions didn't group quite as tight as I would have liked but like others have said every rifle is different. The 160 RN's on the other hand had 1/2" groups at 100m

 

[Meroh]

No shortage of good options for medium sized game. I ran 150gr ABLR last fall in my m70 6.5x55 over enough Ramshot Hunter to hit 2715 fps

What did you hunt with that load? Also does a guy need a fast twist for bullets that long?

Swedish M96 and M38 were built with a 1:7.9 twist. Considering the original 1896 load was about 160 gr.

M70 Zastava is twisted at 1:9. I have no problem with 156 PPU RN SP printing small groups, and I load hot for the both the Zastava and my old Swedes with no evidence of excessive pressure. Interestingly, 85 gr JHP Sierras hit within an inch of the 156 PPUs.

That's why I love these rifles!