600 yard rifle

In calm conditions 600 yards isn't that hard....add some gusting random wind and things get a lot more difficult. I think there was a vid floating around a while ago where an Elk was shot with a 243 at more than 600 yards. So yeah, I sure a 308 in competent hands would work without a hitch in the right conditions.
 
Nothing compare to the 308, sure your rifle is much more powerfull but a 308 will get you anything, anywere, within .5 MOA... This is priceless... JP.

a 308 yes it will get there at 600yards i am thinking put on my glasses and a bat and maybe wack it back come on that is like mounting a S&B on a 45-70
 
This "600yd" rifle is going to be used on game, this is the hunting section after all.

I have and use a 338 Lapua for long range hunting, the ability to buy factory ammo for it that can do the job is a big plus IMO rather than having to turn to handloads with a wildcat caliber or simply can't get the accuracy and power at range without reloading your own.

there is a lot of options when you reload them as you are hunting big game no a you know
 
there is a lot of options when you reload them as you are hunting big game no a you know
forget your wildcat ammo at home on a fly in hunt or have it lost in transport, may never happen to you but some people are not that lucky so commercially available ammo has its plus side in an event like this
 
forget your wildcat ammo at home on a fly in hunt or have it lost in transport, may never happen to you but some people are not that lucky so commercially available ammo has its plus side in an event like this

on a fly in i take my 375H&H do not leave home without it .. the right guns are a investment ..
 
I shoot a 7 mm mag and took a lot of elk at 500-600 yards
I just finished a decated 600 yard elk deer in 6.5 x 55
so some people will tell you that's too far for elk with this rifle
I strongly disagree . I'm running 140 sst through it at 2900 fps
and off all the ballistic stuff I'm 1550 foot lbs at 600
thats double the weight of an average bull .
Shot 1 bull and 3 deer all had pass through with a hard ball exit hole .
all were bang flop dead . I have taken 30 + animals with my 7mm
and my 6.5 does a better job .
rem 700 action
kreiger 26 inch muzzle break
med heavy barrel
mcmillion light sporter
timmins trigger at 1 lb
all bedded
sightron 8x32x56

just for for your comparison
myself and my buddy both shot at a pumkin at 200 yards
he was shooting a 338 mag
I was shooting a 6.5
my 6.5 made a hole twice the size on the entrance hole
 
What guys need to keep in mind about rifles is the ability to break a shot clean given the anticipated recoil. Guys will often miss with big heavy calibers because they jerk the rifle just as the shot breaks. For this reason I believe guys are more likely to make a clean well placed shot under stress with a more moderate caliber.

Case in point: Our company treated a customer to a big buck hunt at a game ranch in Michigan. The customer wanted to use a 300 Mag. that he inherited from his brother who had recently passed away. Well he shot at the buck at about 80 yards and wounded it but it was never found. I was there in the camp office at the Pollington Ranch at the end of the day counting out $5,000 for a monster deer that was never recovered. I remember the day before at the rifle range with the customer that he wanted me to zero the rifle for him because he couldn't take the recoil. I did not touch the gun, it was his hunt.

If you have the discipline to shoot well despite a heavy pounding then go for it. If you have any doubts, then go with something more like a 308.

I'd rather have a slow hit than a fast miss.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't agree more it took years of shooting to work up to being able to handing the heavier recoiling rifles without developing a flinch that and Magnum Kick-Eez recoil pads>
 
What guys need to keep in mind about rifles is the ability to break a shot clean given the anticipated recoil. Guys will often miss with big heavy calibers because they jerk the rifle just as the shot breaks. For this reason I believe guys are more likely to make a clean well placed shot under stress with a more moderate caliber.

Case in point: Our company treated a customer to a big buck hunt at a game ranch in Michigan. The customer wanted to use a 300 Mag. that he inherited from his brother who had recently passed away. Well he shot at the buck at about 80 yards and wounded it but it was never found. I was there in the camp office at the Pollington Ranch at the end of the day counting out $5,000 for a monster deer that was never recovered. I remember the day before at the rifle range with the customer that he wanted me to zero the rifle for him because he couldn't take the recoil. I did not touch the gun, it was his hunt.

If you have the discipline to shoot well despite a heavy pounding then go for it. If you have any doubts, then go with something more like a 308.

I'd rather have a slow hit than a fast miss.

i would have pumped it never too dead i was once told any way time to go away
 
Here is a pic of my 500 yard hunting rifle that doubles as a defence rifle it is a shortened to 21" barreled Rem 700 LSS in 375RUM.

With the Leupold VX3 4.5-14X40mm B&C reticle scope mounted I consistently group 3 260gr Accubods @ 3020fps into 6" @ 500 yards.

With a 200 yard zero the second B&C reticle line down is dead on @ 460 yards.

Reason it is not my 600 yard rifle is I just haven't had the time to figure out the trajectories yet and actually do not care to.

With the scope removed I install an XS Sights tall Weaver ghost ring backup sight gives me cloverleaf 50 yard groups with 350gr TTSX @ 2440fps and 6" 6 shot 200 yard groups.

Finished_21_Inch_Rem_700_LSS_in_375RUM_Dec_2009_011.jpg
 
Here is a pic of my 500 yard hunting rifle that doubles as a defence rifle it is a shortened to 21" barreled Rem 700 LSS in 375RUM.

With the Leupold VX3 4.5-14X40mm B&C reticle scope mounted I consistently group 3 260gr Accubods @ 3020fps into 6" @ 500 yards.

With a 200 yard zero the second B&C reticle line down is dead on @ 460 yards.

Reason it is not my 600 yard rifle is I just haven't had the time to figure out the trajectories yet and actually do not care to.

With the scope removed I install an XS Sights tall Weaver ghost ring backup sight gives me cloverleaf 50 yard groups with 350gr TTSX @ 2440fps and 6" 6 shot 200 yard groups.

Finished_21_Inch_Rem_700_LSS_in_375RUM_Dec_2009_011.jpg

looks like my sako 85 300H&H lam. it has a zeiss diavari 6x24x56t ...so you know what i am talking abought ,, i have a av sako for the bush 1.5x6 z6 in 375H&H as well with a thump hole fagen stock as for looking around in the willows
 
Are you hunting on a quad, with no muffler, wearing jangling spurs, a sparkly thong, drapped in a sequins jacket, and so reaking of cougar urine that you can't possibly get closer to an animal?????

How come I never see these guys shoot this good at the range?
I thought everyone on hunting discussion forums shot big game at 600 yards!
 
I would suggest not going to the range if your intention is long range hunting. Go to the woods and practice with the equipment you will have with you hunting setting up targets in real life scenarios you will have to deal with while hunting will allow you to be comfortable making the shot on an animal. Punching paper on the bench is only going to help you to a certain point.

You misunderstand...

Most of the people I see at the range in the weeks before hunting season have yet to master the basics. If you can't regularly hit a target at 300m at a range from a bench, what benefit would shooting longer distances in the field be? If you're flinching because you've never been taught how to handle your 300 RUM 7 lb hunting rifle, you're not going to hit anything at those distances. You can also use your equipment as if you were in the field. You can still choose to shoot prone, off a bi-pod, etc, but with the controlled factor of known distances. When you become proficient at this, you can move out in to the field with unknown distances and difficult terrain.

I know this because I've been there/done that.

 
I have read this thread and have come to the conclusion that there are probably less than 10% of the posters opining here who have ACTUALLY shot game at 600 mtrs and more.......so posting real world experiences would be pointless.
 
I have read this thread and have come to the conclusion that there are probably less than 10% of the posters opining here who have ACTUALLY shot game at 600 mtrs and more.......so posting real world experiences would be pointless.

Doug, I'm inclined to agree with you wholeheartedly!!
Cheers, Dave.
 
And many won't due to the "ethics police" and the lashings they dish out.

I have read this thread and have come to the conclusion that there are probably less than 10% of the posters opining here who have ACTUALLY shot game at 600 mtrs and more.......so posting real world experiences would be pointless.
 
I have read this thread and have come to the conclusion that there are probably less than 10% of the posters opining here who have ACTUALLY shot game at 600 mtrs and more.......so posting real world experiences would be pointless.

I'd say that's the case in most of these long range discussions...whether it be rifles, cartridges, optics or ethics. It doesn't take long to figure out who is who.
 
And many won't due to the "ethics police" and the lashings they dish out.



YUP those GUYS ( ethics police ) are closely reading every post to jump on ya for sure ! Well here goes :) I ONCE shot a spike whiitetail at ### yards + first shot a bit low just under the body BUT i spined him on the second shot- my buddy was watching thru a spotting scope and called the shot ! 7MM Rem mag with a Horn 139 gr-er at 3200 fps . :) RJ
 
You misunderstand...

Most of the people I see at the range in the weeks before hunting season have yet to master the basics. If you can't regularly hit a target at 300m at a range from a bench, what benefit would shooting longer distances in the field be? If you're flinching because you've never been taught how to handle your 300 RUM 7 lb hunting rifle, you're not going to hit anything at those distances. You can also use your equipment as if you were in the field. You can still choose to shoot prone, off a bi-pod, etc, but with the controlled factor of known distances. When you become proficient at this, you can move out in to the field with unknown distances and difficult terrain.

I know this because I've been there/done that.

I don't see guys at my local range practicing for long range, might have to do with there only being up to a 200yd line and that is it. The woods are far closer than any range where you can practice at anything further.
 
Back
Top Bottom