where would one source the bottom metal and clips that would fit a Rem. 700 SA that would be suitable for the Br or Dasher ?
this has been an interesting thread, even with Jerry's unwanted , off topic input, straight up 223 I don't think so, put it into a 22 Br or a 22 Dasher case , well then that's a matter of how good you read conditions
Hey kt, don't worry too much about Jerry- this precise devolution has been happening again and again for years. To be sure, Jerry has forgotten more than lots of folks learn in the hobby- he's been at it for a long time. At a certain point, it becomes (his) standard entertainment to put some gas on a conversation and start flicking matches. Some folks bite, lots of others just grab the popcorn.
It goes like this:
"Hey I need some help picking a caliber"
"Well everyone is using 6mm and 6.5mm and I can sell you the barrel and bullets"
"Great, that's really good information"
"But you should shoot a .223"
"Why a .223? That's not 6mm or 6.5mm"
"I know, but it doesn't recoil"
"But what about the wind?"
"Oh ya, it blows, but when it doesn't a .223 is the way to go"
"So what should I get again?"
"Whatever you want, and I have barrels in stock... but shoot .223, everyone's tried it and failed, but trust me it's the way of the future"
Keep in mind that there's an intersection of advice and business marketing inherent to these forums, and that's just part of the game.
When folks hear the accurate advice of "pick whatever caliber you want and shoot out three barrels with it and you'll be really really good" it just doesn't sell well.
Hearing "You need a caliber that's been around for 30 years but recently renamed, made with Swedish brass processed in Finland, re-blessed with white gloves in the US; resize it three times before firing, load it with the shiniest most expensive bullets you can buy over 46.5 grains of unicorn farts weighed on a scale that costs enough to get you divorced" just seems to be so much more digestible. Nobody likes hearing getting good takes time and effort.
Post made me smile....
I am not recommending the 223 for this... see previous posts. But if the goal is 6BR performance and lowest recoil possible, then the 223 is the ballistic twin, less recoil with easy set up. Might not be what the cool kids use but it is the same thing....Funny, how that seems like such a difficult concept to understand.
At any rate, when someone needs to start throwing around personal attacks to prove their point, their debate is done and pointless to continue.
I hope that those with the PRS experience will start posting info on Stage prep and Strategy. Offer some info on how to address the various props and barricades.
Then we can all get out and do more practise.... cause that is what will improve scores.
Jerry
Any bottom metal that accepts the AICS will be a good option. I have rifles with Badger M5 and Surgeon DBM, both work good.
For AICS magazines, there are spacer kits available from Primal Rights and Patriot Valley Arms designed for running the 6br's and dashers in an AICS. Some people are even having no issues running a straight up AICS with no spacer kits (2017 PRS #1 shooter ran a dasher with no spacer kits with AICS magazines through a Surgeon action).
The Magpul AICS magazine is supposed to be very tolerant of many cartridges, including the 6br/dasher family - no spacer kit required. So these are another option.
Since I currently reside in the USA, I bought my spacer kit straight from PVA. I believe Gary at Bighorn can bring in the spacer kits, but that would need to be confirmed.
I have started down the road of my own 6br type cartridge project, building a rifle off of a TL3 action (for the gf), and getting a barrel spun up for my older gen Defiance Deviant action. I have purchased an AICS spacer kit from PVA for my AI mags, and I also have a Magpul AICS mag to try out as well. I've done a lot of research to get to this point, but there will be more learnings as I get closer to getting these rifles built. Just waiting on my reamer now.
You may need to get a gunsmith to do some tweaking on the extractor, but you won't know until you try it. My understanding is that the extraction is the biggest potential hurdle.
There are people who have rem 700 repeaters using the 6br cartridges fine, high power shooters have been doing this for a while. Definitely do-able.
that's a good point, whats working ? Sako style extractor ?
G
I''' add one more ( almost heretic ) comment and that is this: if you want 100% reliable feeding, dirt cheap components and the ability to push a nice little (or heavy 115g ) 6mm fast then since the 1950's ( 1955 I think ) we have an answer:- the .243 - 115 DTACs at around 300 FPS will ride wind and have some terminal impact for sure. Of course, the big downside is barrel life but....
Extraction is never a problem, ejection is where the real hard to fix problem is.My understanding is that the extraction is the biggest potential hurdle.
In my experience, I've successfully tried the 6br on the Tikka 595, and will be trying it with AICS modified mags on a Tikka T3. The extractor/ ejector design on these actions works reliably ejecting the case. Feeding on the 595 with factory 22/250 magazines is alright for four rounds, and 50/50 for five. Again, the case was not designed by someone shooting a repeater. The AICS follower mods are available and look to be quite successful for feeding reliability. Be sure to research ejection though. Some actions are not designed to handle such a shorty case. Again, proper tool for the job.
People are already running 224 Valkyrie in boltguns in PRS. With those new 95 SMKs, there will definitely be some 22 BRs/Dashers showing up. Contemplating building one myself...