My car get 40 farthings to the hogs head and thats the way I like it.
Are you sure you don't mean furlongs? Farthing was a type of British coin.
My car get 40 farthings to the hogs head and thats the way I like it.
Are you sure you don't mean furlongs? Farthing was a type of British coin.
I hope you are jokingThe metric system sucks! Pierre Idiot Trudeau in an effort to tune the Canadian economy to the foolish & misguided European silly standard imposed the metric abomination on Canadians. Trudeau hated our number one trading partner and embraced the freakin commie Cuban totalitarian regime instead.
We got Celsius temperatures instead of Fahrenheit. When it's 70F outside and goes to 85F I know the difference. When in January it was -10F I knew it was cold enough to gel 10W30. Below zero is meaningless in Celsius for humans. Our American friends knew better than to adopt a quirky, unrepresentative European concept built on a faulty premise.
TW25B will find it much easier if we switched to ten hours in one day and 100 seconds in an hour.
Damn Sumerians with their base 60 system .
I hope you are joking
Metric is a better system due to it's simplicity. unit of measurements should make sense and simple to use, i.e. water freezing point is 0C and boiling point is 100C, 1 calorie (the amount of energy needed to raise the temperature of 1 gram of water by 1˚C)
, that's why all scientists(even US scientists) use the International System of Units (metric), because it's more simple, more accurate, more elegant.
no quite a function, accuracy is the degree of which the result of measurement correlates a common standard. however, I get what you are saying, perhaps I should rephrase, it's easier to make accurate calculations using metric system due to it's simplicity.More simple without a doubt.
More elegant, perhaps.
More accurate, no. Accuracy is a function of measurement.
From National Standard of Canada
Canadian Metric Practice Guide CAN3-Z234.1-76
1 gallon ( US ) = 3.785 412 cubic decimeters ( liters )
1 gallon ( UK or Imperial ) = 4.546 092 cubic decimeters ( liters )
1 gallon ( Canadian ) = 4.546 090 cubic decimeters ( liters )
There are dry volumetric measurements, 1 Peck ( US dry ) = 8.809 768 cubic decimeters ( liters )
Also; 1 Petrograd standard ( 165 cubic feet, sawn timber ) = 4.672 28 cubic meters
The switch to the ISO metric system was not just a measurement system change.
One area of change was to simplify things like the number of types and sizes of nuts and bolts.
The changes are very wide and comprehensive.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_metric_screw_thread
http://mdmetric.com/METRIC STANDARDS for Worldwide Manufacturing summaries.pdf
Another area
http://www.iso27001security.com/html/27004.html
Also try Googling ; " ISO metric standardization "
I could give you a simple example, I don't plan to change your mind, just to show you the benefits of simplicity in teaching kids maths with the metric system , they get less confused, not saying they won't, but less.Back when the government was selling the idea of abandoning Imperial, they actually said metric is more accurate. They lost me right there.
Also, with all due respect to other posters, using a cultural lack of proficiency in math is not an overwhelming reason to change measuring systems.
Looked at another way, measuring systems are categorically related to sales. People buy in weights and measures, for one thing. For another, specs and comparisons are used for selling. Adding confusion to the mix for the general population seems to move a bit of the advantage over to the sales side and away from the consumer side.
Finally, it has not worked. The last time I bought dimension lumber, it was 2x4s and 4x8s. Nominally. In fact, the 2x4s were not close.
Metric is nice. Imperial is nice. However, I am still waiting to see a compelling argument to prove one is the better choice.
Or just be a crazy mix of both like me!!
in the C or F scale, I know 100F is hot and 30F is cold, but the rest is a guess, tell me it is exactly 25C and I know i'm wearing shorts. But tell me to cook a pizza at 195C and Ican't tell you if I would have to stand by and watch it every min to make sure it dosn't burn or if it would take 3 hours to cook. But say 350F for 15 mins and I can go watch TV (crazy for sure since I can relate outside temp but not the temp of my oven!)
Next if I go to the Dr. and tell them I weigh 195, the need to check and figure out that in KG cause I don't know how much I weigh that way. Same as height I'm 5'7" no clue in cm!!
Speed I don`t know what 25mph is in Km`s or 50km per hour is in miles, but at 220Km per hour Tabernak i`m flying!! yet I know my 0-60mph in seconds! (ps its not fast maybe should time in minutes, see reason below)
25 cm of snow? well does that mean I have to get the kids ready for school, or do I sleep in? 12" of snow WOO HOO early weekend!! 12" something else hehehehe that would be great to show off!
Fuel mileage? I know my Hummer H2 is about 9, yet the wifes Jetta TDI is 55mpg. L/hour?? what?? (yep 9 miles per gallon, its a Hummer, but it does compensate for the missing inches above... kind of)
Yet I know I want 2L of pop or a 40oz of Jack... but is 24oz of pop good for a movie? I don't know
UGH can we just combine some of them for us mixed up ones?
Back when the government was selling the idea of abandoning Imperial, they actually said metric is more accurate. They lost me right there.
Also, with all due respect to other posters, using a cultural lack of proficiency in math is not an overwhelming reason to change measuring systems.
Looked at another way, measuring systems are categorically related to sales. People buy in weights and measures, for one thing. For another, specs and comparisons are used for selling. Adding confusion to the mix for the general population seems to move a bit of the advantage over to the sales side and away from the consumer side.
Finally, it has not worked. The last time I bought dimension lumber, it was 2x4s and 4x8s. Nominally. In fact, the 2x4s were not close.
Metric is nice. Imperial is nice. However, I am still waiting to see a compelling argument to prove one is the better choice.
This one had me cracking up, thanks for the smiles sclifford!Or just be a crazy mix of both like me!!
in the C or F scale, I know 100F is hot and 30F is cold, but the rest is a guess, tell me it is exactly 25C and I know i'm wearing shorts. But tell me to cook a pizza at 195C and Ican't tell you if I would have to stand by and watch it every min to make sure it dosn't burn or if it would take 3 hours to cook. But say 350F for 15 mins and I can go watch TV (crazy for sure since I can relate outside temp but not the temp of my oven!)
Next if I go to the Dr. and tell them I weigh 195, the need to check and figure out that in KG cause I don't know how much I weigh that way. Same as height I'm 5'7" no clue in cm!!
Speed I don`t know what 25mph is in Km`s or 50km per hour is in miles, but at 220Km per hour Tabernak i`m flying!! yet I know my 0-60mph in seconds! (ps its not fast maybe should time in minutes, see reason below)
25 cm of snow? well does that mean I have to get the kids ready for school, or do I sleep in? 12" of snow WOO HOO early weekend!! 12" something else hehehehe that would be great to show off!
Fuel mileage? I know my Hummer H2 is about 9, yet the wifes Jetta TDI is 55mpg. L/hour?? what?? (yep 9 miles per gallon, its a Hummer, but it does compensate for the missing inches above... kind of)
Yet I know I want 2L of pop or a 40oz of Jack... but is 24oz of pop good for a movie? I don't know
UGH can we just combine some of them for us mixed up ones?
An easy question I used to ask doubters who knew the old Imperial system.
Which is heaver, a pound of gold or a pound of feathers ?



























