A$$ Hole...

Thunderhog said:
And so the sh1t show begins.

Mendicino announces first step of firearm buyback program, targeting industry (msn.com)

The creep is already beaking his bull-sh1t.

In the end, all firearms will be banned in Canada.

Anyone that believes otherwise is a complete and udder idiot......:(
Click to expand...

Speaking at a news conference in Ottawa Mendicino said the government signed a $700,000 contract with the Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association to work with businesses and firearms stores.

"This is a significant milestone," the minister said.
 
tj black said:
Speaking at a news conference in Ottawa Mendicino said the government signed a $700,000 contract with the Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association to work with businesses and firearms stores.

"This is a significant milestone," the minister said.
Click to expand...

Yes a significant milestone to complete disarmament of all Canadians!

Great work CSAAA!......:(
 
badboybeeson said:
You do understand that ,if a business refuses to complie with cfo direction for buy back. There cancle your BFL on the spot and the buisness owners and staff are in Possession of prohibited weapons without a licence.
Policr can arrest you pn thr spot
Click to expand...

This was not at the direction of the cfo, this is libs and cssaaa, there has been no deadline for collection how would you be in possession of prohibited? Are businesses not included in the amnesty?
 
badboybeeson said:
You do understand that ,if a business refuses to complie with cfo direction for buy back. There cancle your BFL on the spot and the buisness owners and staff are in Possession of prohibited weapons without a licence.
Policr can arrest you pn thr spot
Click to expand...
Police can arrest me as well, just as easily for using a prohibited firearm. I don't see your point?
 
badboybeeson said:
You do understand that ,if a business refuses to complie with cfo direction for buy back. There cancle your BFL on the spot and the buisness owners and staff are in Possession of prohibited weapons without a licence.
Policr can arrest you pn thr spot
Click to expand...

Make them. The federal government forcefully closing business and arresting / killing Canadians with no criminal history might be enough to give the rest of Canada a head shake. If not, well, we know existing here in this Canada is flawed anyways.

We are supposed to force them in to jailing a hundred thousand of us. Because they can’t.

People have had years to plan for this.
 
Mosin_redstar said:
This was not at the direction of the cfo, this is libs and cssaaa, there has been no deadline for collection how would you be in possession of prohibited? Are businesses not included in the amnesty?
Click to expand...

Many businesses are authorized to possess prohibited under the terms of their license. There has been no direction from the CFO for businesses to surrender any prohibiteds to the best of my knowledge.
 
badboybeeson said:
You do understand that ,if a business refuses to complie with cfo direction for buy back. There cancle your BFL on the spot and the buisness owners and staff are in Possession of prohibited weapons without a licence.
Policr can arrest you pn thr spot
Click to expand...

Apparently it's optional for the businesses to volunteer stock quantities for this agreement. Nothing is required by law at this point, still covered under amnesty as a business.
 
Milanczar said:
Nice bluster buddy but it doesn't cut the mustard.


Inventory is the millstone of any business and a successful business does not invest money in stuff sitting in the store room.

If you don't understand this you have no clue about business other than running a lemonade stand.

No wonder there are so many business bankruptcies that involve unsold and unwanted inventory.


Nobody forced them to stock inventory other than their own greed.

As a responsible business it would be simple just to take and fill orders not to carry stock.

But not having stock and risk that went with it would have resulted in less profit as buyers would not want the risk of being caught out if there was a sudden ban.

Deciding to have inventory was a direct decision to have risk to make more money rather than no risk and making less money.

So the businesses took a direct known risk to carry inventory just to make more money.

If something is being banned and stomped on and you want to run a business importing as much of it as you can

without anticipating the consequences, there is no excuse.
Click to expand...

That's supposed to be an argument. Come on buddy. Your line of reasoning is a joke.
 
Suther said:
BUT Businesses run GREAT if they have very little inventory! My favorite part about going to the gun store is being told everything I'm after is out of stock!
Click to expand...

How dare they serve their customers by providing firearms that were still legal before the bans, while there we big runs on them lol
 
Joel said:
How dare they serve their customers by providing firearms that were still legal before the bans, while there we big runs on them lol
Click to expand...

But were there even big runs on them in early 2020? Its not like the handgun situation where we had months of heads up that the door was closing (plus with handguns we still get to use them, so there was more motivation to get one NOW while you still can). Once the NS shooting/fires happened many could guess what was going to come next, but the timeframe between that and the OIC dropping was too small for dealers to ramp up stock I would think?
 
IvoB said:
Minister Marco Mendicino, Minister of Public Safety made an announcement on the Government of Canada's work to launch their “*buyback*” program for the hunting and sporting firearms captured under the May 1st OIC.



The Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association (CSAAA) is representing the interests of all licensed businesses with the Federal Buyback program for the May 2020 OIC prohibited firearms. Our goal is to help negotiate for fair compensation and a simple process for our businesses struggling through this challenging regulatory environment.



The CSAAA will not be participating in anyway with the buyback of individually owned firearms.



**The CSAAA remains skeptical as to the viability of this industry buyback program; due to positive changes in provincial legislation, the absence of Federal budgetary allocation, and lacking a concrete process of implementation.**

Then in black and white

"The Firearms Community in Canada has always supported responsible gun ownership and will continue to comply with all federal laws. The CSAAA is committed to ensuring firearms businesses are informed of their options and receive their full compensation"

Wes Winkle - President CSAAA
Click to expand...

Wes you did it. Trowed away all customers and gun owners under the bus for a Libs contract. Your business and the CSAAA members are gun communities pariahs - turn coat. Loosers. I hope the gun owners run those business represented by the CSAAA to bankruptcy.

Thats all they deserve.
 
Spin it anyway you want quislings. This is a selfish, "you first after me" appease the tyrant response. At the expense of their customers they're enabling the disarming of a nation.

Disappointed by Wolverine, O'Dell, ammo source, and a few others. While we can assume it wasn't unanimous, it would not be one person signing off on a 700,000 contract. If you disagree, make a public statement. Resign your board seat, quit the association.

So far only John Hipwell has made any statement. This announcement days after the OIC case puts Burlews statements in court in context. It didn't happen overnight.
 
Suther said:
But were there even big runs on them in early 2020? Its not like the handgun situation where we had months of heads up that the door was closing (plus with handguns we still get to use them, so there was more motivation to get one NOW while you still can). Once the NS shooting/fires happened many could guess what was going to come next, but the timeframe between that and the OIC dropping was too small for dealers to ramp up stock I would think?
Click to expand...

Seemed like it to me.
 
nowarningshot said:
Spin it anyway you want quislings. This is a selfish, "you first after me" appease the tyrant response. At the expense of their customers they're enabling the disarming of a nation.

Disappointed by Wolverine, O'Dell, ammo source, and a few others. While we can assume it wasn't unanimous, it would not be one person signing off on a 700,000 contract. If you disagree, make a public statement. Resign your board seat, quit the association.

So far only John Hipwell has made any statement. This announcement days after the OIC case puts Burlews statements in court in context. It didn't happen overnight.
Click to expand...

What did Burlew say in court?
 
nowarningshot said:
Spin it anyway you want quislings. This is a selfish, "you first after me" appease the tyrant response. At the expense of their customers they're enabling the disarming of a nation.

Disappointed by Wolverine, O'Dell, ammo source, and a few others. While we can assume it wasn't unanimous, it would not be one person signing off on a 700,000 contract. If you disagree, make a public statement. Resign your board seat, quit the association.

So far only John Hipwell has made any statement. This announcement days after the OIC case puts Burlews statements in court in context. It didn't happen overnight.
Click to expand...

Can you please link us to John Hipwell's statement?

I am shocked no one on the list has made any public comments on this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom