Brake is essential to LRH. You need to be able to spot the shot.
He is only talking 450 to 500 yards. I have killed several big game animals at that distance without having a braked rifle. In fact, I find the dust and snow thrown up by a brake, to be a disadvantage when big game hunting.
Well, we agree to disagree. Spotting the hit and being able to watch the animal from hit to fall is more important to me. Lots of brakes are setup to send the dust sideways, this has never been an issue with me. Not to mention 500 yard shooting requires practice and its not easy to throw a bunch of rounds downrange with consistency in a magnum with no brake.
And I agree about the Burris Extreme rings. They are a huge pain in the ass. Burris Signature or even lapped Zee rings would be better. Although I have had great success with EGW mounts, even on a magnum, but Rick's experiences could be different. Ken Farrel makes a decently priced steel mount, I just don't like how high they sit.
Spotting the hit and being able to watch the animal from hit to fall is more important to me.
Lots of brakes are setup to send the dust sideways,
Not to mention 500 yard shooting requires practice and its not easy to throw a bunch of rounds downrange with consistency in a magnum with no brake.
Thanks everyone for you input so far, i will be getting a brake and if not the vais which one would you rec ? Also what ring and bases? I will prob get a savage lh undecieded yet
Sight it in using a lead sled or something simular.
Exactly what I would not do, since such contraptions can effect the point of impact.
.300 wsm or wm are not worthy of a muzzle break….. sorry.
+1 on this comment. There's a big difference between a rifle you are able to fire without having it hurt you, and a rifle that you can fire without wanting to flinch.sorry, but that's nonsense..300 wsm or wm are not worthy of a muzzle break….. sorry.