Alberta Hunters...

Arrest them! Tell them they have 20 seconds to leave you alone and leave the area or you will arrest them and charge them with harassment. If they do not leave then arrest them and deliver them to the nearest police officer and have them charged with anything your little mind can dream up. How but uttering threats for one!!

Scott
 
I've been checked by both Jim and Mark in the past year. Great guys. Happy to have them in my area.:cheers:

They are great. We have helped eachother quite a bit over the last few years. Great to see Jim get that award for his service of excellence this past winter.

The boys from Valleyview are good too. THey stopped us on the 43 coming home last fall. We looked like the Clampettes (sp) with the moose heads way up on top. I don't blame them for checking us. It made a bit of a scene on the highway but we were on our way in no time flat, having made another great aqaintance!:cool:

BTW Dave, still haven't heard back. Mark is to be in the office Thursday. Maybe I will call Dawn in Cochrane. She'll steer us straight too.
 
BTW Dave, still haven't heard back. Mark is to be in the office Thursday. Maybe I will call Dawn in Cochrane. She'll steer us straight too.

I called her already and she put me in touch with the forestry office in Cowtown. Now just to find the right contact :rolleyes:

I am workin on it...
 
Arrest them! Tell them they have 20 seconds to leave you alone and leave the area or you will arrest them and charge them with harassment. If they do not leave then arrest them and deliver them to the nearest police officer and have them charged with anything your little mind can dream up. How but uttering threats for one!!

Scott

He can't arrest the person because the crime being commited is only a summary offence, and to use citizen's arrest powers (Criminal Code 494) the offence has to be indictable (or hybrid). This can easily be persued though, and I say run with it!
 
From the Wildlife act

"Prohibition of harassment of hunters

47(1) A person shall not interfere with the lawful hunting of wildlife by another person, or with any lawful activity preparatory to such hunting, with the intention of preventing or impeding the hunting or the continuation of the hunting.

(2) A person shall not disturb, or engage in an activity that will tend to disturb, wildlife with the intention of preventing or impeding its being lawfully hunted.

(3) A person shall not disturb another person who is engaged in the lawful hunting of wildlife, or in any lawful activity preparatory to such hunting, with the intention of dissuading that person from hunting or otherwise preventing the hunting or of preventing that person’s enjoyment of the outdoors."


The person was acting on their own and not under any authority of their position with SRD. So they could be "warned" or charges layed.

I carry a photocopy of this in my wallet and if anyone bothers me while I am hunting, I can show them that they are on thin ice.

Robin in Rocky
 
From the Wildlife act

"Prohibition of harassment of hunters

47(1) A person shall not interfere with the lawful hunting of wildlife by another person, or with any lawful activity preparatory to such hunting, with the intention of preventing or impeding the hunting or the continuation of the hunting.

(2) A person shall not disturb, or engage in an activity that will tend to disturb, wildlife with the intention of preventing or impeding its being lawfully hunted.

(3) A person shall not disturb another person who is engaged in the lawful hunting of wildlife, or in any lawful activity preparatory to such hunting, with the intention of dissuading that person from hunting or otherwise preventing the hunting or of preventing that person’s enjoyment of the outdoors."


The person was acting on their own and not under any authority of their position with SRD. So they could be "warned" or charges layed.

I carry a photocopy of this in my wallet and if anyone bothers me while I am hunting, I can show them that they are on thin ice.

Robin in Rocky

I don't know the details of the encounter, but if the individual was 'on duty' at this time, they could be in a whole lot more #### than that.

At least I sure hope so.

BTW, great idea on having a copy of that Duffy.
 
I don't know the details of the encounter, but if the individual was 'on duty' at this time, they could be in a whole lot more s**t than that.

At least I sure hope so.

BTW, great idea on having a copy of that Duffy.


Ya, I had that already. But a great idea posting it for others to see.

The person was on duty at the time. And at this point I think I am going to take it as far as I can. I am sick and #@&*en tired of these hippy AWA supporters who think that they own the wilderness and the animals in it.

Edit: Take a deep breath and walk away from the computer :runaway: ;)
 
alberta hunters

A bit of advice that was passed on to me from someone who deals with government agencies a lot is: s*#t rolls down hill. Contact the minister in charge by personal letter and cc as many managers/supervisors as you can find. Be polite but be firm. As your elected and hired government officials they have a duty to respond to you, as long as you don't come across as a nut job. The guilty party at the end of the pile should need a lot of TP to cleanup the mess they've created.(In a perfect world!)
 
I hope you do push this davey; I'm all for free speech, but there's a line between that and pushing a private agenda while drawing a public salary, and in doing so breaking the law.

Good on you for drawing a hard line on this.
 
I'm with you Dave, go all the way with this #####. We should stand with Dave on court costs if needed, let's fight this battle with him and win. I'll pledge the first $50.00 .... the skunt needs a lesson. :50cal:
 
I'm with you Dave, go all the way with this #####. We should stand with Dave on court costs if needed, let's fight this battle with him and win. I'll pledge the first $50.00 .... the skunt needs a lesson. :50cal:

Christ, I think I still owe you quite a bit more than that :redface: :D

Thanks for the opinions and support guys :cool:
 
Well guys and gals, here is how it went. It took me quite some time to find the right big wigs to chat with. I had some very long emails and phone calls and from what I hear I caused quite the sh!t storm within Alberta SRD. Lawyers were called and my origional letter and all emails following it made it to the minister Ted Morton, as well as many others high up on the totem pole.

I had quite a few responses basically brushing me off. Once that happened I had said that I was not happy with the outcome and was going to take it further. All of a sudden things changed and they were willing to work with my father and I on what we thought the outcome should be. My father actually had a chance to call this afternoon after reading all the correspondence I sent him, as he was the one that was with me at the time of the incident.

Here is our latest response from Roy Campbell:

Dave / Ed,

I appreciate your efforts to better understand the situation. Dave, I'll answer your question first, followed by how we generally deal with these types of incidents:

Lookout positions start up in the spring and are terminated during the fall (give, or take and given their actual location / surrounding hazard). Although there is no guarantee of employment we generally attempt to retain employees from year to year. Our lookout lady at ***** has been a long time employee, and up to now we have not had any complaints about her conduct. However, given your recent concerns, and based on the knowledge that I have, we are dealing with this incident in the following manner:

*I have personally reviewed your concerns with her to ensure she understands why you found her behavior offensive.
*I have stressed that as SRD employees we are often called upon to play the role of a good host, and personal agenda should be kept separate from gov't business.
*We have documented this incident by covering it off in her performance assessment. If this type of incident were to happen again, your information will provide some background in further dealing with the issue.
*We will also incorporate this scenario into our annual orientation session, which is held with all seasonal staff.

Again, our apologies for any inconvenience this has caused you. You have raised some valid questions on our signage, which will prove useful in developing our lookout safety policies. As well, I sincerely hope that we have also provided you with some insight on our concerns related to lookout safety. I hope you find our efforts to resolve this satisfactory...I enjoyed our discussion very much and am very appreciative of your comments.

Happy hunting!

At the end of it my father and I were happy with the outcome. It was well worth the time taken and when I said that we were not happy with a simple apology and was willing to take it much further things started to really happen.

I know for a fact that in the future this person will act much more appropriately towards hunters, at least while on duty.
 
Last edited:
Good on you! i hate to make excuses for peoples behavior, well actually i'm not making excuses but SRD probably is suffering from the same shallow talent pool that the rest of AB has had to find employees in. 15 years ago these morons could not have found work shovleling #### for the huterites!
 
Good on you! i hate to make excuses for peoples behavior, well actually i'm not making excuses but SRD probably is suffering from the same shallow talent pool that the rest of AB has had to find employees in. 15 years ago these morons could not have found work shovleling s**t for the huterites!

Even Roy Campbell(who is a hunter) admitted knowing that allot of the employees in his department were of a different breed. Something to do with MEC, granola, and tree hugging is what I remember off of the top of my head.
 
Good job Dave

NEVER let it slide. Good for you.

A game warden once checked the deer I had in the back of the truck. Wanted to know where I shot it. I told him about where I shot it. He told me I was coming with him to find the gutpile. I told him I wasn't going anywhere. He told me he would use as much force as necessary to make me go with him.

Being young and a bit rangy at the time, I reminded him I had a rifle and he did not. I would not be going anywhere with him. And I encouraged him to call the RCMP, which he did. I left to continue my hunt, but I first threw my drivers license into his truck so he knew who I was.

Next day I attended the Fish and Wildlife office and picked up my license and got a half assed apology, which I didnt want anyways. Told me I was a young smartass for the way I acted. Told him Id never been in trouble in my life and wasn't about to be bluffed by a lardass out in the bush.

RCMP never did talk to me.

He is good friends with my dad to this day.
 
Good form Dave.

So when do we head up there to see how your friend is doing?
Did they get back to you about the actual hunting around a dwelling, is it 200 yds for the towers too?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom