I will buy an M&P after it has a 20 year service history, with flawless reliability. The G17 is by far the most reliable, trouble free duty pistol ever. Anything less is a compromise.
USP and Sig 226 are just as good, just more money.
I will buy an M&P after it has a 20 year service history, with flawless reliability. The G17 is by far the most reliable, trouble free duty pistol ever. Anything less is a compromise.
I will buy an M&P after it has a 20 year service history, with flawless reliability. The G17 is by far the most reliable, trouble free duty pistol ever. Anything less is a compromise.
Glock.
There is no contest here.
Try to find a Glock and an M&P that have both had over 5-10K rounds through them. Notice that the M&P looks tired, and worn, whereas the Glock looks virtually brand new, and still shoots better.
You can look at mine if you want. It's in awesome shape. They are both excellent. 
Okay. Fair enough comment except for one thing...I was talking about my M&P![]()
I am a righty and prefer the mag release on the right side. I use my trigger finger to release the mag. I have found it to be much faster and I can keep the gun on target much easier then shifting the gun around so my thumb can hit the mag release. Been doing this for over a year and have long concluded JMB probably put the mag release on the wrong side and everyone else just copied him.
Take Care
Bob
If you are reloading you should be behind cover or atleast concealment. So tell me how or why keeping your pistol(that is in need of a fresh magazine) on target is of any value if you can't engage that target? Reloading your pistol at arms length is difficult and not conducive to consistent movements/muscle memory. Perhaps keeping your pistol pointed at a target or rather down range is the reason behind it? If that's the case it sounds like square range mentality designed for the lowest common denominator.
TDC
I looked at the Glock 17 before I bought my new M&P. I liked it but went with the M&P because the Glocks apparently do not like lead bullets.
This is an issue for me because the most reasonably priced bullets I can find are lead so these are what I reload. I couldn't see buying a Glock and then having to pay another $200 for a barrel so I could shoot lead.
John
If you are reloading you should be behind cover or atleast concealment. So tell me how or why keeping your pistol(that is in need of a fresh magazine) on target is of any value if you can't engage that target? Reloading your pistol at arms length is difficult and not conducive to consistent movements/muscle memory. Perhaps keeping your pistol pointed at a target or rather down range is the reason behind it? If that's the case it sounds like square range mentality designed for the lowest common denominator.
TDC
I know a few guys that shoot lead through their Glocks.
The trick is running lower pressure loads.
As one guy puts it... I'm shooting paper.
(p.s. I sold my G17 and it's the biggest case of sellers remorse I've ever had)
Are you off your meds or in the bottle? Where did you read in my post I reload at arms length? Has it occured to you that what might be difficult for you might be easy for someone else?
Do you actually shoot your guns or do you just attend weekend warrior classes and have wet dreams about being a commando?
Take Care
Bob
Please explain how you reload with your pistol directed towards the target? Either its at arms length or you're executing your reload from retention(elbow to rib cage). In either case keeping your pistol pointed at the target is neither practical nor possible if you use cover to reload. Behind cover you can't see you target so you can't be sure your pistol is still pointed in the right direction. During a reload(from cover or not) your pistol is not in a condition to be of any use until AFTER you complete the reload, so why concern yourself with keeping sights(and muzzle) on target??
TDC



























