another Tavor Demo shoot

22lr

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
33   0   0
Just got back from our range. Spend some quality time shooting and making new friends. Below I will try to summarise my impressions of Tavor and some targets for your jundgement.

First thing one would notice - Tavor barely fits rifle hardcases, or doesn't fit at all. Second impression ( in chrono order) would be that Tavor doesn't fit rifle rack at the range for it is so short. I was scratching my head thinking what do I do now, rules are somewhat stringent at our range. They say "rack the gun" - you rack the gun.

First few shot I did early in the morning yesterday before everybody showed up. I found grouping being disappointing, so I took Tavor apart and cleaned the bore and then I used benchrest cleaner that dissolve the copper - there was a lot of copper fouling, visible flakes on the patch. Taking down Tavor beats even Kalashnikovs, it kinda falls apart from mental effort only. First dedicated group at 50 yards after the cleaning

50ydsme-2.jpg


50ydsme-1.jpg


then some more from other guys, at 50 yards

50yds-1.jpg


50yds.jpg


then another one at 100 yards. I used bigger bull for red dot is about 6.5MOA and this bigger bull leaves little dark edges, much easier to aim accurately. Hence is visible improvement in grouping

100ydsme.jpg


here is one at 25 yards

25yds-1.jpg

25yds.jpg


Groups aren't that impressive for benchresters around here, but I say there is a lot of potential for improvement. As you can see most spreads are vertical, that is explained below. I say with red dot there is about 0.5" aiming inaccuracy. Plus if someone tweaks good handloads, lighter trigger and whatnot, it can be shrunk under 1MOA easy. Some targets shot at 50 yards in long strings (20 shots or more) revealed drift of POI to the right with heat build up, still within the bull though.

The gun is awesome, I really like the ergonomics of it, by far the best fitting gun I ever had in my hands. I am not too happy with mag release, I guess I am a bit too spoiled with AK74's. There were some folks ( and those are folks who knows how to shoot) that weren't too happy with cocking handle being in front and bolt release way back... I am sure any young fella given Tavor as his first gun will find Tavor very easy to operate.

Works like a swiss clock, pock pock pock all day. Mind you there was ONE fella and Tavor was jamming in his hands, jam after jam, bent cases, life rounds falling off from underneath - I still can't figure out how can one guy be so bad with the gun. He is a very good shooter ( better than me anyways) but Tavor just won't function in his hands. He was using his handloads too, maybe cases lost their dimentions or whatever. Everybody else just had a blast.

Now is the bad part. Red dot thingey. M21 is it. Total garbage. I wouldn't put it on my guns for free. I say CanadaAmmo cancel the order and get us these beautiful guns with rail only. Let us figure our needs ourselves, OK? Here is why I am so dissappointed - parallax is HUGE. If I move the pupil of my eye I can see dot drifting about 8" across the target. For some reason parallax is only in vertical axes but it ruins all the fun newertheless. Below is a little illustration with target shot by one guy twice, one in uninterrupted string and another one with a small talk between shots.

parallaxillustration.jpg


Overall impression - very good gun. Put descent (or even half descent) optics on it and oh momma...
 
Last edited:
Logic

The forced purchase of a useless optic is the bad part of that gun, nice gun, but there is a 500-1000 peice of garbage on it that you will just be tossing out after you purchase said item. So, the gun itself gets a Thumbs up (so it sounds) but all reviews so far have made a less than favorable commentary about the optics. If there was no optic on it I would be 'comping at the bit' but I just dont like the idea of tossing out 500+ dollars!!! Plus when the first 50 of these things sell there will be 30'ish of the Red-Dots in the exchange forums... so there will be NO resale on it! Which means that you are just forced to keep it as a 500+ dollar souvaneer.

For 3000 I can get something else thanks.

Also, I will bet that these new Bull-Pups that are surging into Canada right now will be for the next group of Prohibs. For 3000 to use it for 1 year.... Nope...

HP
 
Cocking handle to the front, bolt release way back... It takes a bit of practice to lock the bolt open when there is no empty magazine. No doubt about it.
Mag. release is slick compared to an AK. Push the catch back with right thumb, mag. falls free. No stripping out of the mag. New mag. in with left hand, hit the release with left thumb. Mag. changes are not as fast as with an AR, but pretty darn good for a bullpup.
I don't think that the Mepro21 is garbage. I think it is a useful, but very specialized sight. If all shooting were confined to CQB drills, 100m and less, it would be perfectly serviceable. Service rifle matches go back to 500m, and the sight just would not work for that. There is another quirk with the M21. It uses tritium for low or no light. The dot is right there, at night, even if the target is no more than a shadow, you can aim. There are fibre optics for daylight shooting. You can see the dot against the sky. Aiming from light into dark, no problem. Aiming from deep shade into bright sunlight, there is a problem. Not enough light for the fibre optics to work, and the tritium alone isn't bright enough. The dot is there, but you have to hunt to find it.
Personally, I think that the M21 will make the rifle harder to sell. A good place for the M21 would be on a dedicated AR upper reserved for CQB. Or on a deer rifle, for hunting in the woods. Excellent snap shooting sight.
Handloads? Obviously the ones described just didn't work in this rifle. When we shot the Tavor at OSA, the rule was - no handloads. This is someone else's $3000 rifle. If a case were to fail, and damage the rifle.....
 
Last edited:
The forced purchase of a useless optic is the bad part of that gun, nice gun, ....

Also, I will bet that these new Bull-Pups that are surging into Canada right now will be for the next group of Prohibs. For 3000 to use it for 1 year.... Nope...

HP


As far as the Bullpups or this specific rifle its has to be named in an OIC for it to become PROHIBITED.... Perhaps with evil AR15s and other rifles. Its up to us to proove that these rifles (Bulpup or not) arent "evil".

Lets not kid ourselves .. Bulpups today, huntin "sniper" rifles tommorow ... they have already tried to ban ALL HANDGUNS!!!

that defeatest attitude is what every Liberal wants to hear...

I still think that the company bringing this into the country deserves a kudo (no I dont work for CanAm). This is the first Civilian export of this rifle ..not bad for Canada huh?

Shazam (rant off)


PS - Great Review of the Rifle. Yes Optics suck ass.
 
Last edited:
Cocking handle to the front, bolt release way back... It takes a bit of practice to lock the bolt open when there is no empty magazine. No doubt about it.
Mag. release is slick compared to an AK. Push the catch back with right thumb, mag. falls free. No stripping out of the mag. New mag. in with left hand, hit the release with left thumb. Mag. changes are not as fast as with an AR, but pretty darn good for a bullpup.
I don't think that the Mepro21 is garbage. I think it is a useful, but very specialized sight. If all shooting were confined to CQB drills, 100m and less, it would be perfectly serviceable. Service rifle matches go back to 500m, and the sight just would not work for that. There is another quirk with the M21. It uses tritium for low or no light. The dot is right there, at night, even if the target is no more than a shadow, you can aim. There are fibre optics for daylight shooting. You can see the dot against the sky. Aiming from light into dark, no problem. Aiming from deep shade into bright sunlight, there is a problem. Not enough light for the fibre optics to work, and the tritium alone isn't bright enough. The dot is there, but you have to hunt to find it.
Personally, I think that the M21 will make the rifle harder to sell. A good place for the M21 would be on a dedicated AR upper reserved for CQB. Or on a deer rifle, for hunting in the woods. Excellent snap shooting sight.
Handloads? Obviously the ones described just didn't work in this rifle. When we shot the Tavor at OSA, the rule was - no handloads. This is someone else's $3000 rifle. If a case were to fail, and damage the rifle.....


Tiriaq thanxs for tip on mag exchange, I guess thats the way to do it with right hand thumb dropping mag free.

Now regarding M21 sight - I was the biggest fun untill I tried it. Generally I would agree red dot is the way to go for under 100m distances, as long as they work right. I am still thinking, maybe I was doing something wrong? But then again, there were other folks who's POI was for the whole group either way too hi or way too low which leads me to parallax issue being the real problem. Does anybody know if parallax is anything fixable, or adjustable?

Heck, the gun itself worth 3K without sights. Compare it to SIGs that go for the same price with no sights, I would take Tavor rather than SIG. Sights or no sights.
 
Heck, the gun itself worth 3K without sights. Compare it to SIGs that go for the same price with no sights, I would take Tavor rather than SIG. Sights or no sights.

I love comments like this. Can you say, "Price increase on the next order?".
 
The M21 has a US retail of about $500. The rail has a Canadian retail of about $400. I would suggest that the rifle with rail would be less expensive than with the M21, and would be an easier sell. Chris has pointed out that right now, IWI is not offering any options other than the Tavor/M21 package to him. Hopefully this is a situation that can be resolved.
I did not notice a shift in POI resulting from a parallax issue. By the same token, we did not do long strings of deliberate shots testing grouping.
OSA sponsors both CQB and Service matches. For the CQB, the rifle would be fine as is. For Service Rifle, the sight would leave a lot to be desired.
 
It has been pointed out to us that the M21 is retailing on eBay these days for a hair over $300, with todays exchange that is say CAD$350. We are working with IWI to supply the guns with the rail only, but if you want the gun, the first batch will have the M21. With the T97 coming VERY SOON, and the fact that we see very little profit from the Tavor over other items, I cannot guarantee the future, who can.
 
I got one with M21 for a friend . I d get one if it came with the rail . Does anyone know if it s a good idea to fit an Elcan DR on it ?
 
ill say it again if some one sends me the gun for a few weeks ill see what it taks to make a rail for it that will be cost efectice for all buyers.
if anyoen has got any of are S&J Hardware stuuf you will know we onlu do high end high QC stuff
bbb
 
no its in the big tavor thread, i'm still holding out for a railed version, because atm, the cost of the tavor is up there with the PE90 because both needs to get an rail and another optic to function fully, where the PE90 has got the name on it, the tavor has got innovation, as soon as there is a railed non- m21 version that is cheaper, the tavor comes out on the top with that package, but for now, its hold off for me (which is basically, which one i see for sale at a gun show first :D)
 
no its in the big tavor thread, i'm still holding out for a railed version, because atm, the cost of the tavor is up there with the PE90 because both needs to get an rail and another optic to function fully, where the PE90 has got the name on it, the tavor has got innovation, as soon as there is a railed non- m21 version that is cheaper, the tavor comes out on the top with that package, but for now, its hold off for me (which is basically, which one i see for sale at a gun show first :D)

I thought you were holding out for a PAL first? ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom