If the DCRA adopts the IFCRA rules and I think they are...snip....
The DCRA has adopted ICFRA TR rules, starting in 2009. We will also be adopting ICFRA F-Class rules at the 6-7 Dec meeting of the Executive; they too will be effective for 2009.
We have the "problem" ("opportunity"?) of two very-similar classes
- F(F) - "Farqhuarson", the original Canadian F-Class
- F/Restricted - ICFRA int'l .223/.308 F-Class, which is known as F/T-R("Tactical Rifle") in the USA
The only real differences, as you say, are:
- F(F) gets to use any means of support for the front of the rifle, just like F(Open), whereas F(Restricted) is only allowed a bipod.
- F(F) is limited to the same bullet weights (81/156) as Target Rifle; F(Restricted)
Now it is an open question whether F(F) and F(R) are so similar that they ought to be rolled into one (but which one?), or whether they are different enough that "merging" them would be unfair (or otherwise make shooters unhappy).
The DCRA is quite open about offering new styles of shooting in the national championship match that it runs, though there is a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem that you can't run a class if nobody (or not enough) show up to shoot it. In addition to "TR", the DCRA has successfully introduced F(Open), and F(Farqhuarson).
The DCRA has unsuccessfully offered "TR/M" (as in, Target Rifle fired with a military rifle, such as a C-7/AR-15), and also "TR-O" (Target Rifle Optical - what the Americans would call an "Any/Any Rifle"). If you offer something and nobody (or not enough) people shoot it, then sooner or later you have to allow that maybe it isn't time for it yet.
Look for an outreach campaign quite soon now, to see if there are enough people interested in shooting F(Restricted) at the DCRA's 2009 Canadian Fullbore Rifle Championships. If people are serious about shooting it, the DCRA is serious about offering it...!