Regarding: "...a 20" bull barrel...", above; anybody see/handle one of them enough yet to see what the barrel-channel will take, without significant hogging-out?
I want to get this stock, replace the factory barrel with a 20" bull barrel, target crown and muzzle brake it with bipod, tac light, laser and a rangefinders all mounted on a bunch of bolt-on picatinny rails.
Then I'll rename it a Notta Nagant
Seriously folks, I love it, but stock, rifle, scope and mount would cost at least $600.
The "sniper Mosins" were considered "very accurate" because they could shoot at least 2 moa. Not spectacular by today's standards.
...but ya I still want one, when I have money to burn and I'm up for a challenge.
Might just be worth the ridiculing I'll get from my gunsmith...
Actualy the minimum accuracy required from the 91/30 PU rifle was to shoot 10 shots into 3.5 cm (1.38") at 100m, 7.5 cm (2.96") at 200m, 18 cm (7.09") at 400m, and 35 cm (13.79") at 600m. Wich is pretty damn good considering they didnt have sniper/match ammo either they were issued ammo from batches that were found more accurate durring testing.
Actualy the minimum accuracy required from the 91/30 PU rifle was to shoot 10 shots into 3.5 cm (1.38") at 100m, 7.5 cm (2.96") at 200m, 18 cm (7.09") at 400m, and 35 cm (13.79") at 600m. Wich is pretty damn good considering they didnt have sniper/match ammo either they were issued ammo from batches that were found more accurate durring testing.
Regarding: "...a 20" bull barrel...", above; anybody see/handle one of them enough yet to see what the barrel-channel will take, without significant hogging-out?
These specs look pretty close to what's considered a worn out M24. Good for its day but, once again, not spectacular by today's standards. I'd be happy if I got a 2moa rifle out of the project. 4in groups at 200 yards is fine for hunting deer! If I'm hunting 300+ plus yards then I'll use my 3/4 moa plain old Savage 116.




























