I think he meant earplugs AND ear muffs at the same time.
no complaining in the reason for the start of the thread.
If you are referring to me complaining I am not even close to complaining yet. This is complaining.
The only complaint I have is everyone wants a big boomer (because I MAY WANT to shoot out to 1000 yards) but few are able to MAN UP to the recoil of the big boomers. Suck it up PRINCESSES.
Why do you think I shoot small cartridges? NOT A FAN OF BIG RECOIL. Thus, I do not need a muzzle break (which is noisy) to have an enjoyable day at the range.
There that is my rant........
CBY
I regularly wear two layers of hearing protection at work, but I've noticed that the improvement over just ear plugs or just earmuffs is about half of the first layer. So if you got 100% hearing protection with ear plugs, It is like 150% with both.
For the most part I don't think it is worth the benefit for shooting, which isn't as bad(to me) as industrial equipment.
Wrong.
A weighted tests have shown Muffs with a 29NRR plus custom fit earplugs which are the best you can get and around 30NRR only give you an extra 3Db down of protection.
At best, you will be 34NRR.
To protect the best when someone is using a brake keep your mouth open slightly it helps to equalize the pressures from the shockwave to the small bones in the inner ear and provide the same relief as double protection.
That is very nice of you to point out that I am wrong when I was making a comparative observation using no form of measurement other than my own perception. Which if you were to take a moment to think about what I said, then it would be "accurate" to the numbers you posted. I would concede that my percentage comparison is not the most accurate but conveys the point that two layers does not provide two times the hearing protection.
Next time you try to correct someone, please understand the content of their response before you make a fool of yourself.
I use custom molded earplugs and and a high end noise reduction communications headset.
I did, and read your response. It implied 150% more protection which is 100% WRONG.
Don't get mad becase you are WRONG, just take the correction as that so you give out the correct information.
Wrong.
A weighted tests have shown Muffs with a 29NRR plus custom fit earplugs which are the best you can get and around 30NRR only give you an extra 3Db down of protection.
At best, you will be 34NRR.
To protect the best when someone is using a brake keep your mouth open slightly it helps to equalize the pressures from the shockwave to the small bones in the inner ear and provide the same relief as double protection.
When somebody next to me blows my ammo off the bench with his brakedIf you are complaining about noise and shock waves at a range it is time for a new hobby.
No, it's YOU'RE problem because you are the kind of person who cannot seem to show any respect for another at the range.If I'm shooting beside someone with a brake on my rifle that's their problem.
Man up![]()
I'm not mad, because you cannot read. If your earplugs are considered "100%" of the maximum hearing protection, then adding ear muffs would be perceived like adding an additional 50% of hearing protection on top of that. So, when using simple math, 100 plus 50 equals 150.
As I'm sure you know decibel is a ratio measurement, meaning that 50 is not half of 100. So even though adding muffs only adds a very small amount of additional db protection, the perceived reduction is greater.
The funny thing is I was merely using a "seat of my pants" measuring method and you were completely unable to understand that.
Actually, I believe it yourself that is incorrect.
If 30NRR represents a 100% reduction in noise, an increase to 34NRR would actually represent over a 150% reduction as there is a 50% attenuation with every 3 decibel increase.....
Explanation....it's a log scale!