While I agree that it was painful to watch, and that the ending was not needed, these guys did point drive the point home that a lot of these old military rifles are a lot stronger than the Lawyers would have us in North America believing. Just look at the Factory load specifications on 8x57, 7x57, 6.5x55, and there are probably a hell of a lot more than I can think of. Admittedly, I skipped through the beginning, so I don't know if it was mentioned, there was a case years ago in the States where Garage Gunsmith buba, who probably had a negative IQ, decided to rechamber a 6.5x50 Arisaka, NOTE RECHAMBER NOT REBARREL! he then proceeded to run a 30-06 chamber reamer in and rechambered the 6.5 barrel for 30-06. Apparently, the recoil (maybe in this case should be spelled reqoil) was out of this world, and the bruise was not just on his shoulder, and it seems to me that the the recoil was so much it knocked him off his feet as he was unprepared for his own stupidity. BUT, the Arisaka held together. Tests have been done proving that if it was any other rifle this would not be the case. But with the metallurgy that the Japanese were using, with the minerals they were taking out of China, the 6.5 Ariskas, of the Early WW2 and back to Japan`s occupation of China in the mid 1930`s, were the strongest rifles ever built.
My gunsmith told me they actually rechambered a 6.5 Arisaka in Gunsmithing school years ago, and after tying it to a clamped down shop vice, they yarded on a rope and set her off. Apparently, the muzzle blast was something else, but, the rifle was just fine! They had to beat the action open, but the .30 cal bullet swagged down, and I had to think of what the pressures would be.