Haven't shot one but I'm also interested. Fwiw from what I've read, a lot of user quite like them (good quality and handling characteristics) and like the removeable rear sight on the speed versions compared to the original. I'm curious to see other impressions as well. They are not cheap though.Just trying to get some opinions and thoughts on the Arsenal Firearms Strike One Speed pistol ?
Not entirely true, the gun is sensitive to a bad quality reloads. Shots flawlessly with factory ammo and quality reloads.I've shot the first Gen ones when they first got here. Not the Speed.
Super low bore axis, light and quite attractive polymer gun. Has nice colour combos. Points instinctively. Interesting trigger feel. Better than a Glock but "different". Accurate enough but, surprisingly, even with the low bore axis, it still has more recoil than expected esp for a 9mm.
The big downside is the 2 guns I tried were both jam-O-matics. Neither gun could complete one stage of a match without FTEs or FTFs. Both guys eventually gave up on the guns. One went to a Glock, the other to a Springfield XDM.
Yeah the regular strike one I used to have had lots of issues. The famous mag drop issue where the slightest whisper would cause the mag to drop (let alone actually firing a shot)....
You used to have the gun with problems then sold her and magically a new owner has no issues.Also many jams, fail to feeds.
Yes a nice idea, but those Russians really dropped the ball on quality control. I would never look at them again.
![]()
LOL, Russians are guilty in the USA election results and Italian pistols quality
You so much as blink at my strike one and the mag will scratch your foot...
Love my strike one. Maybe 2 fte in 1000 rounds. After cleaning it's perfect. Super accurate. I want a speed too since there isn't much upgrades you can do to the original
With so many great polymer pistols out there that are cheaper, why bother?