I'm a newbie with handguns and am about to purchase the first 9mm pistol and I am completely baffled. I've gone to ranges and shot appx. 300 rounds using various range guns. So far I've narrowed it down to M&P9, Glock 17, Sig 226, and H&K P30L.
Thing is, when I shot the first three, I found that price has not a lot to do with accuracy(for my average sized hands and below average skill), and in fact, I can shoot consistently smaller groups with the M&P9 compared to both Glock & P226. I haven't seen a P30L yet... so haven't been able to fire one, only a 1911-type HK.
Also, I noticed that I tend to shoot to the lower-left when I'm having trouble(with Glock & P226).
Is this something that is common with new shooters? Does the size of the grip(double stack or not) have anything to do with it? Is there a compelling reason to spend double for Sig or HK compared to M&P9? I expected better results with the Sig & HK, but it doesn't seem to be the case.
I also recall that my shots were better with a Beretta 94 compared to the Glock 17.
I was about to order a gun, but now I'm stuck. Help!
Thing is, when I shot the first three, I found that price has not a lot to do with accuracy(for my average sized hands and below average skill), and in fact, I can shoot consistently smaller groups with the M&P9 compared to both Glock & P226. I haven't seen a P30L yet... so haven't been able to fire one, only a 1911-type HK.
Also, I noticed that I tend to shoot to the lower-left when I'm having trouble(with Glock & P226).
Is this something that is common with new shooters? Does the size of the grip(double stack or not) have anything to do with it? Is there a compelling reason to spend double for Sig or HK compared to M&P9? I expected better results with the Sig & HK, but it doesn't seem to be the case.
I also recall that my shots were better with a Beretta 94 compared to the Glock 17.
I was about to order a gun, but now I'm stuck. Help!


















































