He got off easy. I would guess the cost of replacing a therapy dog is a lot more than 4K.
It may have not been an accredited therapy dog, perhaps it just identified as a therapy dog. The hunter is responsible to identify his target before he shoots, however this dog certainly looks like a wolf, was apparently running free, and if there was no other person in the vicinity and nothing showing on the dog hinting 'dog', then how was he to know? As usual, we only get an edited version of this story.
He shot it in a zone that doesn't have a wolf season.
It was also wearing a collar. The owners were close by (like 20 ft away if I remember right), but the dog had gone up and embankment onto a gravel road so the owners were out of sight down a hill.
Anyone who thinks that fat dog looks like a wolf hasn't seen many real wolves.
Regardless of the dogs status, this guy tried to poach a wolf, and only got caught because he shot someone's dog.
He shot it in a zone that doesn't have a wolf season.
It was also wearing a collar. The owners were close by (like 20 ft away if I remember right), but the dog had gone up and embankment onto a gravel road so the owners were out of sight down a hill.
Anyone who thinks that fat dog looks like a wolf hasn't seen many real wolves.
Regardless of the dogs status, this guy tried to poach a wolf, and only got caught because he shot someone's dog.
If it was aggressively coming at him in a threatening manner I don't think the no wolf season is a valid point....just my 2 cents though.
If it was aggressively coming at him in a threatening manner I don't think the no wolf season is a valid point....just my 2 cents though.
If it was aggressively coming at him in a threatening manner I don't think the no wolf season is a valid point....just my 2 cents though.
It was a therapy dog for autistic kids. Probably about as docile as a brick of butter. Your experience of dogs must be solely of the kind you can pick up with one hand to think that this was a reasonable shoot.
"Aggressively coming at him in a threatening manner." LMAO.
Why don't you think the fact that he was out of season is a valid point? He was committing an illegal act, in an area where it's never legal. Just because a dog is coming towards you 'aggressively' doesn't give you free reign to shoot it. Imagine if posties carried guns!
Seems to be OK if the CO does it https://nationalpost.com/news/canad...-his-dog-to-death-during-b-c-ice-fishing-trip
the guy should be in prison, with a lifetime ban on firearms ownership and hunting
that being said is every dog now a therapy dog of some kind? I mean all dogs are but do they need a label?
Seems to be OK if the CO does it https://nationalpost.com/news/canad...-his-dog-to-death-during-b-c-ice-fishing-trip
the guy should be in prison, with a lifetime ban on firearms ownership and hunting
that being said is every dog now a therapy dog of some kind? I mean all dogs are but do they need a label?
The problem with lifetime bans is they give no incentive to straighten up. Give someone a lifetime hunting ban, and you've just made them a poacher for life.
Thats nice. Its also wholly irrelevant. What a CO does when a dog approaches him agressively while hes investigating a fishing violation is very different from a hunter shooting a non-agressive animal that he thought was a wolf in an area WHERE THERE IS NO WOLF HUNTING.
Why do you feel so inclined to defend this guy who gives all hunters a bad name?
I'm just going to drop this subject...I wasn't there so I don't know what really went down....hunter shouldn't have shot it but I can see it happening if the dog/wolf was aggressive.
Whats wrong with the owner taking some responsibility and keep his working dog under his/her/their control.
And just to be clear this gives the person involved a bad name....how does this give Hunters in general a bad name or are you just trying to be more dramatic.
Just my humble opinion though...![]()




























