I have taken them all apart, the fact is the Baikals' are scrutinized with an entirely different set of expectations. Somehow, "just working" vaults them into the category of much finer weapons. Brownings, Berettas and Benellis are not held to the same standards. These manufacturers must build guns that are as aesthetically pleasing as they are functional. They are not allowed the occasional hiccup or malfunction, they must go thousands of rounds without cleaning and they must retain their value no matter what, as evidenced by some sellers on the EE. You may love your Baikal, but it is built to a lower set of standards, a lower price point and with all due respect a different buyer. If it goes bang everytime you pull the trigger, it is doing what it was designed to do, unfortunately that is all it was designed to do. The same cannot be said for the other B-guns. Cheers,
Patrick
I will admit they are not as asthetically pleasing but definitely more reliable than my Gold or 1100s ever were.
I have not shot berettas or Bennellis but everyone who has one loves them.
I personally find the walnut stocked Baikals to be UGLY but the syntetic are nice enough. They were not just designed to be reliable but designed also to be affordable, unlike the berettas and the bennellis, Browning/Winchester... not too bad.





























cool:





















