hey all
I apologize if this is a repeat question but multiple forum searches have yielded frustrating non answers.
could we maybe get a sticky of 45 's compared going? I would like to buy as 45 but is a 400 norinco decent or not. I know the leupold scope is better than my tasco. but is it 5 times better as its five times more expensive, i think not my opinion.
So the question whats a good option without breaking the bank? what is reasonable pricing?
thanks all
J
I am sure others have mentioned it before but here goes again, any gun is the cheapest part of the equation over time when you factor in the cost of shooting it. So depending on your use case, here are few suggestions...
If you like the trigger of 1911 and just want a gun that works out of the box; look at STI USPSA/STI Trojan/STI Spartan/Remington R1 Enhanced/Ruger SR1911. As you move down the list, the more you may need to do them to get them just right depending on your tastes but those higher up the list come with features people usually add after the fact. For example, the USPSA is a forged frame, with tritop slide and checkered front strap and magwell. Compare this to the Spartan that is a nice gun but no forged frame etc. Reason I did not include the Kimber, Para or S&W options in here are because although they may have a cooler brand - I have seen none shot competitively. As with any 1911, remember the gun will NOT be 100% before you shoot anywhere from 1000-2000 rounds needed to break in a 1911.
Now for the Norinco, there is absolutely NOTHING wrong with this gun. The major caveat though is, it is extremely rough out of the box, lapping and dehorning are the minimum work you must do on this before I would consider it ready for shooting. Sight cuts are also weird so beware if you ever want to switch them, grips suck and I would also replace the sear/trigger to make it smoother and achieve a sub 3lb pull. Factor in which of these you may want and how much it will cost you down the line vs picking up a gun now that has most if not all of your wants complete from the factory.
I dont shoot production much so my knowledge in terms of durability and reliability on options like Glock/HK are limited, however from my experience with my personal M&P, it has been extremely reliable as well as I prefer the ergonomics to the other options. Adittionally I havent seen any HKs shot competitively.
PS: I did shoot a Glock17 once in USPSA that was a borrowed gun from a friend (my form 6 at the time hadn't been processed to cross the border with my own rig) and out of 15 stages, I had issues in 10 with malfunctions. It is a nice guns but not designed to go as fast as the standard or classic counter parts IMHO.
Now the cost, a case of 45 is approx. 350-400 per depending on the deals at the time. Factor that into your annual cost for this gun. How much are your planning on shooting it, and will you be able to afford as much as you would like? Personally I go through this in 1 or 2 range trips so for me personally, unless you reload; 45 is a 'fun' caliber that I play with 2-3 times a year
Also consider, if you are going to use the weapon competitively, I would humbly suggest that you are looking at the wrong caliber, I started with 45 in IPSC and learned in a few months the cost of ammo and the speed that can be achieved with it makes this a few steps shy of public masturbation that is shooting revolvers in IPSC
I only read the first page so apologies if I repeated something someone already said in subsequent pages, also these are my personal opinions based on what I have observed; which may or may not apply to you depending on your use case and or style