If anyone really cares....
Here's how it breaks down for me...
I'm not about to lay down 700+/- on a gun that I can’t even fire, on the advice of a gun shop commando who’s being paid $8hr for his "professional opinion". That would be utter stupidity on my part. Further more after taking the plunge and later figuring I bought the wrong gun for me I’m not about to let it sit on the EE for months on end, finally taking a loss on selling it cause it’s a heap of crap that know one else wants. A situation, which could have been avoided by asking for advice the first time round.
Lets back up to the title of the thread “best 9mm for under $700”. Well yes “best” is subjective…. But I did give quantitative terms…. so is it my “poor choice of vocabulary or someone else’s miscomprehension?
Of course everyone has opinions of fit and finish and function…so give me that…. give me your opinion of 9mm pistols under 700. If there are one or two manufactures that yield positive responses that will give me a starting point in making my selection. If 50 people say buy a glock that doesn’t mean I will, but it will certainly make the short list. Its called listening to the advice of seasoned shooters. Otherwise known as doing my research. I suppose if I wanted to I could read some biased reviews…. I’m sure that would be helpful. In my opinion best way is to ask the people that shoot the guns…cant go wrong with that. After all I live in Nova Scotia…not a lot of mega stores with a wide selection, so I can almost bet I won’t even get to wrap my fingers around the grip before the transfer is completed.
If I wanted to be “spoon fed” I would give someone the 700 and tell them to get me what they think is best…again utter stupidity
Good choice and reliable choice are also subjective or are they relative? Who knows and who gives a s**t. Isn’t semantics fun?
I just want to spend my money wisely…. why re-invent the wheel by making uneducated newbie decisions.