Using your theory AB-69, perhaps even a 221 Fireball or even better, a good 22 Hornet, could up the ratio even better. As long as the round fits one's need, and one had enough of this ammo on hand. To go even smaller, may end up with severly diminished returns I think.Exactly, thats the whole idea why the US military switched assault rifle calibers in the Vietnam conflict and beyond.
Ratio 2:1
I don't plan to get myself in the position in which I need sustained cover. I would need a round to take out primary targets and get my family/ group out of there. That's why I would pick either the 6.8 or the good, old fashioned .308.
Any extra holes one might acquire will be enough to change ones plans. As for needing cover for an extended period of time. That's something you may not have the option of choosing.
Being a victim is a choice, and its not always yours. Think about it.
TDC
I'll take two of them!Shoe box that shoots deadth ray....
Shoe box that shoots deadth ray....
and dont run around with an old nazi uniform on![]()
A lot of good thoughts and opinions, and a little bit of consistency, but it seems to depend largely on what a person already has. What I think would help the OP (and myself, for example) would be an idea of the best couple of options to look at pursuing in a SHTF firearm.
I own an SKS that I hate and an M14 that I love, but I'm not wild about carrying (or purchasing) a couple thousand rounds of 7.62 unless I'm bugging out in my Toyota. The problem I'm having is I could shell out $3000 and pick up pretty much everything I want (a pistol, a shotty, and an AR/CZ) after getting my restricted this spring, but I'd prefer to shell out another $1000 or so and pick up a dedicated platform (upgrades for my M14? An AR? A CZ?) and spend the rest on ammo.
I just can't seem to figure out the best route to go, and each seems to have downsides no matter what path you figure.



























