15 post and an expert is born...quoting an obscure and illusory musing from Jack O Conner and hacking on Elvis certainly makes you special if nothing else.Bigbill said:I read the following in The Rifle Book by Jack O’Connor.
“The 257 got some bad breaks. For one thing, the original bullet was round-nosed and the cartridge was given a short overall length. … Standard factory ballistics give the 100-grain bullet at 2900 feet per second… . These figures can be considerably improved with judicious handloading. … With 49 grains of No 4831 it can be given about 3200 with permissible pressures.”
I think these words first appeared in the 1964 edition of the book. Barrel length is not mentioned, but even if it was 24 inches, as opposed to 22, does this mean the 25WSSM is something we should get all hot and bothered about?
On the other hand, Supercub is clearly wrong, in that the 25 WSSM does NOT “duplicates the centuries older 257 Roberts.” The Roberts is an elegant and timesless cartridge that meets the requirements of the discriminating hunter. It also feeds flawlessly.
In my view the 25WSSM is a disgusting monument to hype and ignorance. It is a cartridge a later day Elvis Presley might like, to be chambered in a chrome-platted, custom job, with a synthetic stock studded in rhinestones. The sort of thing a New York pimp might like to have. It would match the white jump suit Elvis used for his Vegas Shows. The “King” could use it to shoot out street lamps in Memphis, while swallowing down cheeseburgers, whole, and emptying bottle after bottle of amphetamines.
That is what the 25WSSM is all about.
Big

Great to hear from the undisputed champion of Varmint killers... Nice to have you back grnhawggrnhawg said:Well back to ESSEX County!
I don't think you have a centerfire rifle season for Deer down there so unless you are going to take a drive north you will be shooting varmints only with the largest being ferral dogs and coyotes. .243 is way enough gun for all those and then some and if you take the drive north it will cleanly dispatch the largest of Deer with the heavier bullets. 58 or 65 Vmax's will shoot chucks and crows across the farm all day and leave no bruises or fatuiged body parts. The Stevens or Savage will get you shooting inside your price range and will shoot with the best of more costly guns. Stay clear of the NEF!! You want to spend time shooting varmints not looking for a load that will shoot. I have one in .243. My other .243 is a Reminton varmint contour and it will shoot chucks routinly at 400yrds. Bit more money but the Remington is a very nice rifle
I hear them Tika's aren't bad but Tika to me sounds more like something you'd name a female Husky puppy(grnhawg can now see smoke coming from BigRedds ears
)
BIGREDD said:15 post and an expert is born...quoting an obscure and illusory musing from Jack O Conner and hacking on Elvis certainly makes you special if nothing else.![]()
FYI the #27 Hogdon Manual actually lists a load for the .257 Roberts. 49 grains of 4831and the ACTUAL velocity from a 26 inch barrel is EXACTLY 3010 measly fps... sorry about your luck.
My neighbour has a Jack Russel named Tikka! lolgrnhawg said:I hear them Tika's aren't bad but Tika to me sounds more like something you'd name a female Husky puppy![]()
Sounds like a plan! There's groundhawgs sleeping under those hayfeilds right now just waiting die.BIGREDD said:Great to hear from the undisputed champion of Varmint killers... Nice to have you back grnhawg![]()
I really like the .243 as well... but I gotta tell you bud that little quarter bore will outshoot that .243 at long range all day long.
We will have to get together in the killing fields this summer for sure... and put it to the test.![]()
SuperCub said:How is it that the findings/writings of JOC are "obscure and illusory" and the Hogdon Manual is to be accepted as gospel?![]()
![]()
And while the Elvis/25WSSM comparison WAS hilarious, the statement was prefaced with the words, "In my view", so it should be taken with a grain of salt, and not as an "expert" opinion.
Besides, we all know that there is only one REAL expert here on CGN, and that is ............
CAPTAIN DEADLY!![]()
![]()
.


John Marshall said:I have a browning a bolt in 25 wssm and personally I love it. I am not an expert on reloading stats but I have killed more than my share of predators. I find it bucks the wind well with a heavier bullet and out to 400 yds it is very predictable. Most of the people that I have met that carve the 25 dont own one. My research has shown that is equal to the 25-06 which is considered an excellent round? I was recently browsing through a 1972 edition of Gun digest and there is an excellent article about the merits of the 25 round. 257,25-06 25-35 etc. I have used a 22-250 and a 243 for many years but I think with some time the 25 will hold its own. The cartridge design is similar to the likes of 6br. Very short case, Therefore less time for combustion. Therefore less window of oppurtunity for inacuracies.
He May or May Not have chronied that load, but just because he does no mention it doesn't make it obvious that he didn't.BIGREDD said:Well I personally like Jack O.... but he obviously never chronied that load or he would have made that fact perfectly clear. And If you have any doubts about that data then chrony the load...
You and I both know that published loading data is a guideline only regulated by lawyers. Loading data varies widley, esp from older to new manuals. Hogdon is limited in it's pressures for older calibers like the 257Roberts and others like it given the possibility of some imbecile loading it hot for some old military small ring mauser or other weak action. If the 25WSSM was loaded to "published" 257Roberts pressures, the results would be much different, but you know that already.BIGREDD said:If you think that published Data is somehow less credible than a best guess or an opinion.. than well... you are special too.![]()
Same old argument same old bull####... as we already have concluded in this same argument over and over again... the 25wssm does not develop anymore pressure than the 25-06.... in fact it develops less when you correlate the pressures from CUP to PSI. So how much pressure do you think the Roberts would develop using 20% more powder to achieve the same velocity as a 25WSSM... geezuz if your gonna talk foolish lets take this to the off topic section.SuperCub said:You and I both know that published loading data is a guideline only regulated by lawyers. Loading data varies widley, esp from older to new manuals. Hogdon is limited in it's pressures for older calibers like the 257Roberts and others like it given the possibility of some imbecile loading it hot for some old military small ring mauser or other weak action. If the 25WSSM was loaded to "published" 257Roberts pressures, the results would be much different, but you know that already.![]()
.
BIGREDD said:15 post and an expert is born...quoting an obscure and illusory musing from Jack O Conner and hacking on Elvis certainly makes you special if nothing else.![]()
BIGREDD said:If you think that published Data is somehow less credible than a best guess or an opinion.. than well... you are special too.![]()
BIGREDD said:But in my opinion it was served up in a feeble attempt to ridicule something that is beyond the authors limited understanding.![]()
![]()
It must REALLY be frustrating trying to help "special people" with "limited understand" and "foolish" ideas, grasp at the realm of reality.BIGREDD said:if your gonna talk foolish lets take this to the off topic section.![]()
SuperCub said:You changed the subject ........ My points were these.
1. Published loading data varies widely.
2. Older calibers are given lower pressures (in published data) in consideration to older/weaker actions that may be used. This is called "liability management".
.




























