I wonder if slamfire is gonna chime in here on this thread, may have missed it in the past 120+ posts.
I support the decision of BBC if it helps keep illegal 3D guns out of the hands of criminals… as they commit crimes which are then used to impugn the legal firearms community. Perhaps this also makes it a little inconvenient for lawful owners, but they ought to have a PAL anyway. There are some vendors where PAL and DOB are entered once and are used for subsequent orders, while I’m not a fan of providing more personal info than necessary, we’re buying from firearms businesses so I’d think it comes with the territory.
I’d also defy anyone to find LE willing to crack down on a vendor for asking for this info contrary to that regulation mentioned in a previous post.
EDIT- just saw in another thread slamfire got pinked
If. I'd like to know exactly how this works and how it's efficacy is measured.
Secondly, it's not with the territory. It isn't a legal requirement and as pointed out by others in this thread, citing law... is a potential violation of existing law.
Thirdly, the police love any organization that tracks and retains data that they can benefit from. This is obvious.