I love the dial aperture sight.
I would rather it had been lighter and shorter for better balance, the ergonomics worked well otherwise. I would love to fire the original model on full auto, I think that would have worked:]
Had one on my first Aussie Lithgow L1A1. Defective, detente would work loose after a few rounds and drove me crazy. Switched it back to original issue.
In the original 7.92x33mm, as nature intended. I thought I had fractured my face when I fired the G3 on FA. Lumpy bit behind the back sight partly to blame. The FNC on burst of 3 was lovely.I doubt full auto would work with a lighter and shorter when it didn't work with the heavier.
Nasty rifles. Heavy and even after 'balancing', the recoil against the cheek bone was plain unpleasant. Out of the box my Norinco M305's shot sweeter and more accurately than any C1 I every fired. As for the '25' set...nothing worse than humping that POS for 48hrs under radio silence only to discover that when you really needed it... you couldnt raise a soul. Imo the most satisfactory use for a 25 set was to tie down a poncho corner for a shelter half. Anyone who remembers otherwise is delusional. I recall doing radio checks for the platoon and 4 guys standing in a large circle approx 25m apart couldnt hear each other. There is a reason why during the invasion of Grenada...the yanks had to use pay phones to call fire missions and give sitreps.
Nasty rifles. Heavy and even after 'balancing', the recoil against the cheek bone was plain unpleasant. Out of the box my Norinco M305's shot sweeter and more accurately than any C1 I every fired. As for the '25' set...nothing worse than humping that POS for 48hrs under radio silence only to discover that when you really needed it... you couldnt raise a soul. Imo the most satisfactory use for a 25 set was to tie down a poncho corner for a shelter half. Anyone who remembers otherwise is delusional. I recall doing radio checks for the platoon and 4 guys standing in a large circle approx 25m apart couldnt hear each other. There is a reason why during the invasion of Grenada...the yanks had to use pay phones to call fire missions and give sitreps.
As for Grenada....digging deep in my memory...I believe the Americans even had a tough time using the Pay Phones...until they found a young reservist Lt. that had a valid 'AT&T Calling Card' because they were long distance calls and nobody at the Pentagon would accept a collect call...FFS!Ohhhh, my god!
I have not laughed so hard in years.
Every single word is true, but as far as FN's go I still love them even though they can be nasty beeches at times.
My issue C1 was really accurate at 600 yards using stock IVI ball rounds.
I had a XL butt stock on mine and it made a real difference from smackin me in the chops.
Ahhhh, CFB Petawawa and Borden in the good old days.
When you said the detente , you means the screws? Didnt it have the S spring?
Nasty rifles. Heavy and even after 'balancing', the recoil against the cheek bone was plain unpleasant.
Then you had the wrong butt length for you. They came with butt stocks marked with the length: S (short), N (normal), L (long), etc.
It mattered when doing rifle drill as well. Tall guys hated the shorter length butts as they had to hook a finger under the front sight in order to 'Shoulder Arms', for which you got a wrap on the knuckles from the Platoon Sgt.
I think the folding cocking handle was a mistake as it used to get jammed shut with fine grit or ice up, requiring a bayonet to pry it open. I don't recall ever using the stripper clip guide of the body cover after basic training.
I fired the Bundeswehr 7.62mm rifle on FA with their lowered power ammo - virtually uncontrollable. It lacked a hold open device after the last shot, a stupid idea on an infantry rifle. The C1 made a distinct sound and you also felt the lock open when the device engaged.



























