Bought NEA-15 upper, Doesn't fit.........

Status
Not open for further replies.
How, after 3-4 years, have they STILL not figured this out? You can make an upper receiver on a 3d printer with dimensions found with a google search, but yet they can't make a piece that fits. Are they just making up their own dimensions and hoping for the best or what??

do you believe these guys used to make airplane parts? a part that really needs to fit with other parts made by other companies!
wow
 
Well I shipped it back on their dime. Just sent the emt for the Cerro foraged upper and got a colt bcg as well. I'm quite happy it didn't work out got better parts for cheaper.
 
do you believe these guys used to make airplane parts? a part that really needs to fit with other parts made by other companies!
wow

You'd be surprised how often precision manufactured parts are out of whack in a ton of industries.
I've done parts that had to be half a millimeter or better. I buggered up, or someone else buggered up further up the chain, or a supplier. Some mass manufactured goods were really "one offs" even though they came from the same batch. It happens. If it does not fit, make it fit.
 
Hey there are millions of components on an aircraft. Who knows what they have been making?
They just call themself "Aero space engineering" with several decades of "combined experience".
Don't you know what "combined experience" means?
 
There is no way a polymer lower is mil spec. Not a chance. Mil spec requires the lower to be made from aluminum etc.

So if all the measurements are to proper tolerances as per the military specification. Does it not equal mil specs? The person asked if the lower is in spec and it is in spec, it's within mil-spec tolerances where it matters.
 
So if all the measurements are to proper tolerances as per the military specification. Does it not equal mil specs? The person asked if the lower is in spec and it is in spec, it's within mil-spec tolerances where it matters.
the openings might be correct and within tolerances, but the material strength of the polymer lower will be no where near the strength of 7075 or 6061 aluminium and I don't think polymer is one of the material that is in the US Army specification document for M4 rifles.

more than likely it is the thickness of the polymer lower that is causing a fitment issues with the NEA upper.
 
You'd be surprised how often precision manufactured parts are out of whack in a ton of industries.
I've done parts that had to be half a millimeter or better. I buggered up, or someone else buggered up further up the chain, or a supplier. Some mass manufactured goods were really "one offs" even though they came from the same batch. It happens. If it does not fit, make it fit.

Half a millimeter is not a tight tolerance. That is a little less than .020", say +/- .010". +/- .010 is kid stuff.
 
the openings might be correct and within tolerances, but the material strength of the polymer lower will be no where near the strength of 7075 or 6061 aluminium and I don't think polymer is one of the material that is in the US Army specification document for M4 rifles.

more than likely it is the thickness of the polymer lower that is causing a fitment issues with the NEA upper.

If you read the whole thread, you will see that the OP couldn't get the upper to fit on ANY lowers.
 
I have no sympathy for people who fail to do their research before buying expensive gear. NEA is well known for less than quality or in spec products. There are much better brands for similar money and some killer deals on superior brands in the EE.

TW25B
 
Hey Guys,

I ended up going with a 14.5" NEA-15 complete upper with BCG.

First issue I realized was that it doesn't clear my polymer lower's front pivot pin 'ears'. This was due to the hand guard (12" bottom + top rail, short side rails) touching the ears. I had contacted NEA and they had no problem re-working a hand guard to fit. Since I took off the hand guard I decided to mount it up to my lower, the front pivot pin went in easy the rear one wouldn't budge. Long behold after removing the rear takedown pin detent, in order to see why the pin wasn't engaging the upper; there is about 1/16" of the upper reciever's inside the lowers takedown pin hole.

I have contacted the company I purchased it from requesting a refund. Has anyone else had this happen with their upper being out of spec??

Welcome to my world!

Lots of NEA stuff doesn't fit. Another case and point:

7D7prb.jpg


This is my dust cover. DD replacement on the gun, and NEA not. See the difference? The "pad" in the middle is much smaller on the NEA one, thus making it impossible to close the upper/lower with the dust cover open. The cover comes down to much, and catches on the lower's lip.

Again, why? These are standard parts, produced by God knows how many companies, and without these issues. I also had to clean up the holes for the dust cover rod, it was a super tight fit.

I've replaced 8 other things that just weren't right, or I didn't like. Solid gun otherwise since NEA replaced the handguard for the new version. Much better.
 
You'd be surprised how often precision manufactured parts are out of whack in a ton of industries.
I've done parts that had to be half a millimeter or better. I buggered up, or someone else buggered up further up the chain, or a supplier. Some mass manufactured goods were really "one offs" even though they came from the same batch. It happens. If it does not fit, make it fit.

"Half a millimeter" is nothing. I have to set up my machine chuck to 0.001mm TIR and maintain this daily for 3000 parts a day.
 
Which of course means that this is an NEA problem ............. uhhhhhhhhhhh?

The chances of multiple lowers being that far out of spec(dimensionally that is) is a far lower possibility than the upper being the culprit. Add in the endless threads about poor quality and craftsmanship, the shilling etc etc and it's a safe bet to make that the upper is indeed the issue.

TW25B
 
The chances of multiple lowers being that far out of spec(dimensionally that is) is a far lower possibility than the upper being the culprit. Add in the endless threads about poor quality and craftsmanship, the shilling etc etc and it's a safe bet to make that the upper is indeed the issue.

TW25B


What brands did he try? Omni, Norinco, etc...
Or did he try Daniel Defense, Spikes, BCM, Noveske? Probably not.

Very true. I believe they've been making AR's(kind of) for over 5 years now?? How long does it take to copy the specs that have been available to the public for over many years!

TW25B

Rob Arms has been making the XCR-L since 2006 and are on something like version 6 or 7 and they're just now getting close to getting those right yet people have been buying those rifles for years even though CGN members have been bashing them since day two.

How long have Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge or even Mercedes been making cars? Yet they still have warranty claims daily and mass recalls all the time.
It's the cost of doing business these days when a company is trying to keep up with the demand of a large market.
How would we respond if these companies simply said "FU!, if you want a perfect product with no chance of issues we'll build every one by hand to exact tolerances and run them through 10 layers of QC before each one is released. Oh and by the way your Chevrolet Silverado will now cost you $300000 and we'll only be producing 1000 units per year for the world market. Please take a number and wait your turn."
Guess what, only the ultra rich would be driving cars and the rest of us would either ride a horse or take the bus.
If you want to see what it costs to have a perfect product have a look at Koenigsegg cars, they don't even list a price because unless you're a multi millionaire you can't afford one and there's no financing option for us mere mortals who want something we can't actually afford.

My point is that every company has issues, some more than others. The important thing to keep in mind is how do they stand behind their product.
Even top end companies throw out a dud every now and then, just ask Mike about the Christensen Arms AR he bought thinking he was getting one of the best rifles available.
 
Last edited:
What brands did he try? Omni, Norinco, etc...
Or did he try Daniel Defense, Spikes, BCM, Noveske? Probably not.

If you read my thread (mentioned earlier), I tried Colt, Bushmaster, and DPMS lowers on my NEA upper (with new gen rails) and it would not fit any of those lowers.
It will fit its own NEA lower. Why? Well, in my thread, I have a pic of why. The diameter of material around the pivot pin holes on their lowers is much less, so it fits.
 
What brands did he try? Omni, Norinco, etc...
Or did he try Daniel Defense, Spikes, BCM, Noveske? Probably not.



Rob Arms has been making the XCR-L since 2006 and are on something like version 6 or 7 and they're just now getting close to getting those right yet people have been buying those rifles for years even though CGN members have been bashing them since day two.

The XCR is a raging pile of sh*t as well, I never claimed it to be quality and I agree with your statement.

How long have Ford, Chevrolet, and Dodge or even Mercedes been making cars? Yet they still have warranty claims daily and mass recalls all the time.
It's the cost of doing business these days when a company is trying to keep up with the demand of a large market.
How would we respond if these companies simply said "FU!, if you want a perfect product with no chance of issues we'll build every one by hand to exact tolerances and run them through 10 layers of QC before each one is released. Oh and by the way your Chevrolet Silverado will now cost you $300000 and we'll only be producing 1000 units per year for the world market. Please take a number and wait your turn."
Guess what, only the ultra rich would be driving cars and the rest of us would either ride a horse or take the bus.
If you want to see what it costs to have a perfect product have a look at Koenigsegg cars, they don't even list a price because unless you're a multi millionaire you can't afford one and there's no financing option for us mere mortals who want something we can't actually afford.

Designing NEW features in a vehicle has issues and requires constant adjustments. The AR has been in production for over half a century and the specs are not a secret. Teething issues are normal, but not for 5 years running and not for major issues like the one the OP posted or the endless number of other failed or broken guns talked about in past threads. The high end super cars are not overly reliable but they also aren't built to be daily drivers. They are however top of the line and cutting edge so again you will have issues. NEA is far far from being top of the line and is cutting edge only in how it shills it's wares.
My point is that every company has issues, some more than others. The important thing to keep in mind is how do they stand behind their product.
Even top end companies throw out a dud every now and then, just ask Mike about the Christensen Arms AR he bought thinking he was getting one of the best rifles available.

A company that supports its product is great, but I expect it to work out of the box and to give a respectable amount of life before anything fails. AN upper that won't fit, a bolt that explodes after THREE rounds, triggers that are almost too heavy to physically pull, misaligned handguards, etc etc are not "warranty" issues that a company needs to stand behind. These are quality control issues that are clearly absent and haven't been rectified in YEARS.

In the bold for your reading enjoyment. Oh and check Repro77's post for the known quality in SPEC brands that the upper was tried with.

TW25B
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom