- Location
- Nova Scotia
That receiver is impressive. Cost much?
May need to hit him up to do my RRB..
May need to hit him up to do my RRB..
That receiver is impressive. Cost much?
May need to hit him up to do my RRB..
Bolt knob - I have noticed how different the "Enfield's" were compared to mausers from about that time?? Mausers tended to have straight bolts - significant hand movement from shooting position, to grasping and operating the bolt and then back to the shooting position - the "Enfield's" just seem to start and end up at much more "ergonomic" position - had read that bolt knob position (plus "#### on close") also contributed to the relatively high rate of fire that was possible with the No. 1's, that simply could not be matched with the mausers - especially the straight bolt handle ones. Do not know if it is important on the OP's rifle, but have also read how the knob can be "too close" to trigger on hard recoiling rifles. I do not doubt at all that there is a "cosmetic" element, as well, but I am pretty much ignorant about those kind of nuances. OP will explain better...
Bolt knob - I have noticed how different the "Enfield's" were compared to mausers from about that time?? Mausers tended to have straight bolts - significant hand movement from shooting position, to grasping and operating the bolt and then back to the shooting position - the "Enfield's" just seem to start and end up at much more "ergonomic" position - had read that bolt knob position (plus "#### on close") also contributed to the relatively high rate of fire that was possible with the No. 1's, that simply could not be matched with the mausers - especially the straight bolt handle ones. Do not know if it is important on the OP's rifle, but have also read how the knob can be "too close" to trigger on hard recoiling rifles. I do not doubt at all that there is a "cosmetic" element, as well, but I am pretty much ignorant about those kind of nuances. OP will explain better...
Well in my case it purely for looks. It sets it apart from the more common lee enfield bolt with the round knob.
The lee enfield bolt design is really good. All of them had the same style other then the carbine,they were used on horse back with scabbards. So they had the bold handle flattened to the receiver with the knob cut down flat and sweped ahead as to not catch anything. Also a few other mods not related to the receiver to aid in this.
All the other lee metford and enfields have a very well designed bolt and handle. Infact you never let the bolt go while firing quickly. Its at a position that you grip the bolt with your thumb and pointer finger and work the trigger with your middle finger
I like the look of the LEC bolts my self, even more so with no safety and where i dont need it to be fast i can go with looks over function.
Im building a 500 jeffery on a p14 action. Im very excited about the dog lag bolt handle on that. Seems very usable and robust. Less style more practical i think.
Well in my case it purely for looks. It sets it apart from the more common lee enfield bolt with the round knob.
The lee enfield bolt design is really good. All of them had the same style other then the carbine,they were used on horse back with scabbards. So they had the bold handle flattened to the receiver with the knob cut down flat and sweped ahead as to not catch anything. Also a few other mods not related to the receiver to aid in this.
All the other lee metford and enfields have a very well designed bolt and handle. Infact you never let the bolt go while firing quickly. Its at a position that you grip the bolt with your thumb and pointer finger and work the trigger with your middle finger
I like the look of the LEC bolts my self, even more so with no safety and where i dont need it to be fast i can go with looks over function.
Im building a 500 jeffery on a p14 action. Im very excited about the dog lag bolt handle on that. Seems very usable and robust. Less style more practical i think.
![]()
![]()
Don’t move the bolt handle ahead for looks.