Calgary Shooting Centre BROKEN INTO !!! Oct10/11 - 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
We need to learn from the bad guys!!!
Legal gun owners need to learn and use the precedent set in 2016 R v Jordan to their advantage when facing frivolous gun storage or similar charges. If it works for the bad guys it should also work for the good guys.
 
We need to learn from the bad guys!!!
Legal gun owners need to learn and use the precedent set in 2016 R v Jordan to their advantage when facing frivolous gun storage or similar charges. If it works for the bad guys it should also work for the good guys.
Well ,so fat, it only works for the bad guys.
 
Is this being gazette somewhere? Anywhere?

Disgusting...yet very very Canadian.

R vs Jordans. Can be googled. Essentially says the crown has a specific period of time to bring the matter to trial. When a charge is laid a stop watch starts. Delays are on the crown unless the delay can be shown to be tied to the accused or his counsel.

The Supreme Court set a specific limit. I believe it is 18 months but can't recall specifically. Defence adjournments don't count toward this time limit.
 
We need to learn from the bad guys!!!
Legal gun owners need to learn and use the precedent set in 2016 R v Jordan to their advantage when facing frivolous gun storage or similar charges. If it works for the bad guys it should also work for the good guys.

Jordans is blanket over all cases.

Good guys. Bad guys. Everyone is innocent until the court says otherwise.
 
We need to learn from the bad guys!!!
Legal gun owners need to learn and use the precedent set in 2016 R v Jordan to their advantage when facing frivolous gun storage or similar charges. If it works for the bad guys it should also work for the good guys.

Good luck with that!...:( The dirty and corrupt Government usually side with real criminals, not law abiding gun owners that make mistakes. The new Liberal bag-lickers currently in power, will make a precedent out of you!!
 
So, if I understand this correctly, the police did their part by investigating, then arresting the "alleged" perpetrators and bringing charges. (I understand that everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, but there must have been sufficient evidence for the police to have even brought charges in the first place, right?) Then these "alleged" perpetrators either walk free, or receive drastically reduced sentences for, what? A failure on the part of the court system to execute justice in a timely and effective manner? Seems to me that the court system itself should be on trial for a crime here. They too walk free on this.
 
R vs Jordans. Can be googled. Essentially says the crown has a specific period of time to bring the matter to trial. When a charge is laid a stop watch starts. Delays are on the crown unless the delay can be shown to be tied to the accused or his counsel.

The Supreme Court set a specific limit. I believe it is 18 months but can't recall specifically. Defence adjournments don't count toward this time limit.

I think it was 18 months at Provincial court, or 30 months in superior courts. There was also a mention of the Crown being able to provide info on "exceptional circumstances" to justify the delay like what happened recently in the Lukas Strasser-Hird trial.

Basically loads of people are going to get freebies. Yay Canada!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom