(Bringing the discussion over from another thread)
You know, this whole popper calibration business seems full of ####. I mean, say I hit a popper properly with my 140PF ammo, and it fails to go down. Then the RM comes over and knocks it down - what does that prove? That the popper will fall down when hit twice.
I think it would make much more sense to simply treat the area below the calibration zone as hard cover, and treat the rest of the popper the same way as we treat plates - if it is hit with ammo which makes min PF, it's supposed to fall down. If it doesn't, that's REF and we get a reshoot. It would solve soooooo many issues, I think... Yeah, I know, this isn't Global IPSC Village, but I was curious what the local peanut gallery thought about this...
Freedom Ventures said:Which proved beyond a doubt (much to the chargrin of the RMs) that the 9mm being supplied by Wolf was easily minor PF.
Smart play on the rules on Clint's part. RMs will be watching thier calibration loads a lot closer from now on...![]()
You know, this whole popper calibration business seems full of ####. I mean, say I hit a popper properly with my 140PF ammo, and it fails to go down. Then the RM comes over and knocks it down - what does that prove? That the popper will fall down when hit twice.
I think it would make much more sense to simply treat the area below the calibration zone as hard cover, and treat the rest of the popper the same way as we treat plates - if it is hit with ammo which makes min PF, it's supposed to fall down. If it doesn't, that's REF and we get a reshoot. It would solve soooooo many issues, I think... Yeah, I know, this isn't Global IPSC Village, but I was curious what the local peanut gallery thought about this...




















































