John Sukey said:
Is that why they would fire when a loaded one was placed in the original factory box?
Two of those supposed safeties will only do their job if it is dropped, something you don't want to do normaly. The "safety" in the trigger has caused more than one cop to shoot himself in the leg while re-holstering his Glock.
You can bash me all you wish, I just don't like the design.
If you are going to do something as boneheaded as holstering with your finger on the trigger, why would it be any
more boneheaded to holster a 1911 with the safety off? And don't forget, while holstering, the grip safety is disengaged.
Any gun with a DA first shot is just as likely to fire if you holster with your finger on the trigger.
Other than the 1911, what do you prefer? A Beretta? Decocker, aka no external safety for most models. Ruger? Decocker. If it has a safety, it is so placed as to be virtually useless (up for off!?!). Sig, decocker. HK? Decocker AND safety. Don't forget at least one of those!
The Glock has the same fundamental control operation as everything out there except the 1911 and Browning, except you can't forget to decock.
To dislike the design implies having a basis and/or background to have formed a considered opinion. Despite what your grade 4 teacher said, you'r opinion
can be wrong.
More people ND with glocks because there are more glocks.