Where does this idea come from???
Where from? From the fact that registration = confiscation. Always! How can you confiscate something when you don't know who is supposed to have it? It's the endless argument we've been using against socialist Liberal scum: the registry's only purpose is the confiscation of guns, not public safety!
You know.. in the aftermath of the 1995 witch hunt against gun owners (aka Bill C-68), I have heard from some people that certain rifle owners (friends of friends) never fell in the trap of registering their stuff (which included semi-auto AKs, FN-FALs, etc). And, what would you know: those types got to keep their guns, even after some of those types of guns were later reclassified & confiscated by the CFC (confiscated from registered owners only, of course!). So yes, they were perhaps violating the new "Liberal Law"... but today, knowing what we know, one could discuss at length whether that was right or wrong. Plus let's not forget that we're still within the "registration amnesty" period... 15 years later, lol!
What your saying is make a list to show how Cheap you can get an unregistered handgun which has no historical value and is only a way to pull one over on the man!
You can either pull one on the man that way or.. for half the cost... get a street gun (which happen to be WAY more widely available than antiques are). With antiques, there's definitely the desire of being able to shoot something that's older than your grandpa, even though you have to handload for it... and let's not bullsh*t ourselves: the legal status of such a gun is also a big appeal.
So yes, it is certainly a way to pull one on "the man"
and to enjoy a great historical conversation piece at the range (so basically you get 2 birds with one stone). Saying otherwise (that all non-historical guns have to be in the system) would be condoning the registry and the fascist treatment gun owners have been receiving from our Overlords since 1995!
Rant over...
