- Location
- Thunder Bay ON Canada
I've heard a lot of miscellaneous hooey about cannons and the legality/illegality of such.Generally speaking it comes down to....."That's gotta be illegal"
The most common myths I've read are the sub-500 ft per second rule (trying to extrapolate airgun rules) and the 15mm bore "rule" which applies to smokeless powder rifles that have an "action" lever, bolt, break-breech etc...etc....
I'd like to start a thread to hammer out the real from the deal. It does seem that because re-enactors use them, and no major incident involving the public has brought them under scrutiny, they've continued to be legal.
I certainly hope this thread doesn't encourage anyone to do anything dumb with a cannon that would attract the attention of the authorities and get antique cannons legislated against......
This all applies only to single shot, muzzleloading, black powder cannons shooting solid projectiles, they seem to be considered "antiques" in both Canada and the States. Somewhat like flintlocks, wheellocks, and matchlocks.
*****This is a factfinding thread only and I reserve the right to be wrong*****
Now the Bad News.....
As far as I know, there are serious secondary restrictions on cannons
-Cannonballs and mortars that contain explosives are "destructive devices" are themselves illegal
-safe handling practices are still necessary, you cannot transport them loaded etc.etc. that is illegal.
-You are still legally liable for keeping the projectile on your property.
***this is the biggest restriction I've found on cannons***
-discharging a cannon, even without a cannonball in it, within city limits is "disturbing the peace" and "mischeif" and subject to confiscation and criminal charges
-mounting a cannon on a roadgoing vehicle, like a trailer, is illegal, because of motor vehicle laws.
-mounting a cannon on an oceangoing vessel, it is considered a signalling device and then falls under all sorts of strange and complex maritime laws....
.....Only the use of lit fuse or touch-hole, like the originals, is allowed. Electronic or other ignition would negate the "antique" status, constitute a "modern action" and you'd be violating the law.
- any use of a cannon to commit a crime would negate it's "antique" status, and you'd be liable, just like a flintlock or such....
-People can get hurt with cannons, they always could, if you hurt yourself, you've no-one to complain to.
-If you hurt someone else, or damage property, with your cannon, even on your own property, you may be liable. (like getting sued for damages)
****endnote....If you use smokeless powder for a cannon, you'll likely die...****
http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pb...64/1003/NEWS02
Does anyone else have anything else to add to, or contradict my understanding of the legality of, or dangers posed by, cannons?
The most common myths I've read are the sub-500 ft per second rule (trying to extrapolate airgun rules) and the 15mm bore "rule" which applies to smokeless powder rifles that have an "action" lever, bolt, break-breech etc...etc....
I'd like to start a thread to hammer out the real from the deal. It does seem that because re-enactors use them, and no major incident involving the public has brought them under scrutiny, they've continued to be legal.
I certainly hope this thread doesn't encourage anyone to do anything dumb with a cannon that would attract the attention of the authorities and get antique cannons legislated against......
This all applies only to single shot, muzzleloading, black powder cannons shooting solid projectiles, they seem to be considered "antiques" in both Canada and the States. Somewhat like flintlocks, wheellocks, and matchlocks.
*****This is a factfinding thread only and I reserve the right to be wrong*****
Now the Bad News.....
As far as I know, there are serious secondary restrictions on cannons
-Cannonballs and mortars that contain explosives are "destructive devices" are themselves illegal
-safe handling practices are still necessary, you cannot transport them loaded etc.etc. that is illegal.
-You are still legally liable for keeping the projectile on your property.
***this is the biggest restriction I've found on cannons***
-discharging a cannon, even without a cannonball in it, within city limits is "disturbing the peace" and "mischeif" and subject to confiscation and criminal charges
-mounting a cannon on a roadgoing vehicle, like a trailer, is illegal, because of motor vehicle laws.
-mounting a cannon on an oceangoing vessel, it is considered a signalling device and then falls under all sorts of strange and complex maritime laws....
.....Only the use of lit fuse or touch-hole, like the originals, is allowed. Electronic or other ignition would negate the "antique" status, constitute a "modern action" and you'd be violating the law.
- any use of a cannon to commit a crime would negate it's "antique" status, and you'd be liable, just like a flintlock or such....
-People can get hurt with cannons, they always could, if you hurt yourself, you've no-one to complain to.
-If you hurt someone else, or damage property, with your cannon, even on your own property, you may be liable. (like getting sued for damages)
****endnote....If you use smokeless powder for a cannon, you'll likely die...****
http://www.rutlandherald.com/apps/pb...64/1003/NEWS02
Does anyone else have anything else to add to, or contradict my understanding of the legality of, or dangers posed by, cannons?
Last edited:




















































