cz 455lux or sako quad

badd0g

Member
Rating - 100%
10   0   0
Location
van isle
any one have any experience with these going to do plinkin and some silhouette shooting as well. Opinions, drawbacks to either or any info would be great thanks
 
My 455 American is outstanding. It's real purrty and shoots better than I do. I have 3 barils (17hmr, 22lr and 22wmr) I have to many rifles to buy so I liked the idea of a single gun with different barils for all my rimfire needs. Cost was 575$ for gun with 2 barils and I bought the third baril a few months after for 200$. The sako quad with all barils will prolly end up costing you at least 2x that. Actually just checked and Lebaron has the quad with all 4 barils for 2000$. I have never heard of anyone unhappy with their CZ.

Actually, at 2k$ you could get yourself a Anschutz which is way better than either of these.
 
I had the Sako quad in the 22 mag. This rifle was very accurate. No complaints there but I sold it because I found the frame a little small and purchased a the CZ 452 lux instead. This rifle fit me allot better. I also have the CZ 455 lux in the 22 lr. This rifle is a treat to shot and enjoy using it's iron sights for plinking...
 
any one have any experience with these going to do plinkin and some silhouette shooting as well. Opinions, drawbacks to either or any info would be great thanks

Love my 455.
Needed a trigger job - $20 and 10 min of your time.
Iron sights are good. Magazines are expensive. Mine does not like hollowpoint ammo. With a $100 scope (3-9x40, tall rings), shooting blazer, i can plink shotgun shells at 75 yards 10 for 10 all day long. Very well built. Mine gets lots of abuse -- tossed in the back of the pickup, goes snowshoeing on my backpack, gets wet all the time. No problems, i do clean it well and oil to high heaven though.
 
Back
Top Bottom