CZ 600 thoughts?

Sun_and_Steel_77 said:
Alloy receiver is pretty ballsy and it would interesting to throw the bare action on a scale. If they gained popularity and aftermarket support an ultralight stock might make for an appealing mountain rifle.

I wonder what the finish is on the barrel and bolt...nitrided like the CZ457 :confused: If so it would be a good foul weather option.
Click to expand...

The alloy receiver seems like the way to do with a switch barrel rifle since the lugs lock right into the barrel, alloy keeps the weight down.

They have stated the metal work is nitrided.
 
I'm a little confused why CZ released the new (bastardized) range model a month or two ago right before the release of the 600 series with it's own Range model?

It also appears that iron sights are a thing of the past with Range rifles.
 
first response? disappointing. It's just more of the same mainstream nonsense every other manufacturer is sucking up to. However, I am interested in how the alloy receiver will hold up (very bold move there) and the function of the trigger and bolt. If that receiver proves fine it has the makings of a fine lightweight hunting rifle... if they offer it without the gopping pic rail.

Aside from that, about the only model that is pleasing to look upon is the Lux model... at least it uses a proven steel receiver even though it's a hideous nitride coating instead of blue. And what's with the lousy chambering selection... out of the world of cartridges that include 9.3x62, 35w, 30-06, 7x64, 280, 270, 7x57, 6.5x55, 7mm-08, 257r, 250s and they produce, well, a list excluding all those except the '06.
 
New Camper said:
first response? disappointing. It's just more of the same mainstream nonsense every other manufacturer is sucking up to. However, I am interested in how the alloy receiver will hold up (very bold move there) and the function of the trigger and bolt. If that receiver proves fine it has the makings of a fine lightweight hunting rifle... if they offer it without the gopping pic rail.

Aside from that, about the only model that is pleasing to look upon is the Lux model... at least it uses a proven steel receiver even though it's a hideous nitride coating instead of blue. And what's with the lousy chambering selection... out of the world of cartridges that include 9.3x62, 35w, 30-06, 7x64, 280, 270, 7x57, 6.5x55, 7mm-08, 257r, 250s and they produce, well, a list excluding all those except the '06.
Click to expand...

Not sure about the wood knob. Doesn't sound very durable. And, yes, the Lux should be blued. Oh well, need to keep things consistent to keep costs reasonable. Happy they are keeping 8x57js. I am sure they'll bring out a few additional calibres down the road. Not a bad selection for initial release.
 
New Camper said:
first response? disappointing. It's just more of the same mainstream nonsense every other manufacturer is sucking up to. However, I am interested in how the alloy receiver will hold up (very bold move there) and the function of the trigger and bolt. If that receiver proves fine it has the makings of a fine lightweight hunting rifle... if they offer it without the gopping pic rail.

Aside from that, about the only model that is pleasing to look upon is the Lux model... at least it uses a proven steel receiver even though it's a hideous nitride coating instead of blue. And what's with the lousy chambering selection... out of the world of cartridges that include 9.3x62, 35w, 30-06, 7x64, 280, 270, 7x57, 6.5x55, 7mm-08, 257r, 250s and they produce, well, a list excluding all those except the '06.
Click to expand...

I believe that the Range and Lux models have steel receivers. However I really like the Trail since it is very compact and light, also the full length rail allows for backup iron sights with a reddot sight
 
So, I like the Alpha and Ergo models myself. The Ergo reminds me of the Sako S20 which I made the mistake of handling in store and despite the flashiness and marketing, I adored the ergonomics. However, the MSRP of the CZ is fairly close to the S20 in terms of ballpark ($400 difference), and the S20 has an adjustable stock with QD swivel cups... so I'd lean towards the Sako there, especially in a long action cartridge.

The Alpha though, that could be a winner if it comes in under $1k. The real win here is they introduced the rifle with different receiver sizes. So an Alpha in .308 is an proper short action receiver. I like the stock shape (although the grips are pretty tacky looking) and I like the idea of a mid-heavy contour, 20" barreled magazine-fed .308 with a 40" OAL. That's about perfect, and in the same ballpark as Tikka T3x and Weatherby Vanguard price-wise so it's in good company and we win on selection, different tools for the job.

I'm disappointed the Lux isn't gloss blued and that the sights aren't an option across the board, but if this is the new lineup for the foreseeable future I'm interested in handling one.

EDIT: As a BAR shooter, I'm fine with an alloy receiver - based on the design of the bolt head and barrel locking it could also be a very smooth action.
 
The Kurgan said:
I probably didn't state it very well. Yes, they phased out the 527 and 557. Remaining inventory of 527 and 557 will sell fast for those that want all-steel, box mags (557), threaded barrels and solid bolt heads, and non-Sako (big claw extractor) CRF in case of the 527. Yeah, bummer about 527 mags.
Click to expand...

Just grabbed a 7.62x39 527 carbine in a synthetic stock.. Should be a good companion to my 557 Ranger. I'm an iron sights type of a guy so better buy it now while still available.. I also ordered a couple of mags through A-importer, they have them listed in stock.
 
Pretty neat the 223 has a 1:7 twist.
Not sure what I think of the trail yet. The short overall length and the fact that it uses AR mags (for 223, vs bren for 7.62) is nice. Lack of irons and the fact it offers no weight savings over the 527 is a bit less appealing, though I doubt most buyers care about iron sights. I guess I'll have to wait for reports on how the chassis feels in the hand, given I've never seen a CZ in a brick and mortar store.
The switch barrel was something I thought I'd love on the cz 457 but I rarely if ever swap the 22 wmr barrel in. If they keep the cost of a new barrel kit proportional to the cz457 costs it could be somewhat interesting.

Seems like the 557 had a short run compared to the 550. Has it even been out 5 years ?
 
Last edited:
I don't see anything that jumps out and bites me to say buy one. Cartridge choices are standard fast movers, not sure I like the pic rail setup or the safety. Interchangeable barrels sound interesting, if they decide to offer more selection in cartridges. For now I can pass on them.
 
Older CZs and Brnos are great rifles. These likely are also; but with all the new technology, it is too soon to tell how it is going to stand up in use. 4 setting trigger, vertical safety, magazine lock all look like they may be prone to dirt, and the longevity has yet to be proven.

Don't get me wrong, I love the features and the new design; just a bit slow to jump on the band-wagon with new technology.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom